fake p2p files?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nbpgt
    Platinum Poster
    • Jun 2004
    • 1044

    fake p2p files?




    A University of Tulsa (UT) research team has patented software designed to prevent illegal downloading of music over the Internet.

    The new software sends illegal downloaders on a wild goose chase in a P2P pond full of cyber-quacking decoys.

    Gnutellassassin on Board

    Earlier this month, the U.S. Patent Office awarded patent number 6,732,180 to UT computer science professor John Hale and doctoral student Gavin Manes for software that systematically injects decoys into P2P file-sharing networks, such as Gnutella (news - web sites), BitTorrent and Kazaa.

    Many copyrighted songs show up on such peer-to-peer networks freely available for download without remuneration to the recording artists.

    The software combats such copyright infringement by "essentially flooding the networks with alternative content that appears authentic," said UT spokesperson Rolf Olsen.

    The anti-P2P piracy technology exploits the very characteristics that make peer-to-peer environments easy targets for copyright violators.

    Anyone can connect to such a network anonymously, so decoys masquerading as legit content are hard to detect, easy to place and quick to download.

    The decoys quack with white noise, low-quality recordings, or advertisements urging users to legally buy the song they are after.

    "The beauty of this approach is that it does not impede legitimate uses of P2P networks," Hale told NewsFactor. "It can surgically target pirated media."

    Pirate2Pirate

    The recording industry reports that P2P piracy in 2003 cost record labels and artists some US$700 million in lost compact-disk sales.

    To stem the losses, the Recording Industry Association of America (news - web sites) continues to blitz pirates with lawsuits, but the effectiveness of this approach ultimately will wane, because "the next generation of peer-to-peer systems offers superior connectivity, enhanced search facilities and even greater anonymity," Manes explained.

    A decoy that adapts to its changing environment -- like the "Predator" of movie fame -- offers a better way to combat a problem -- like the equally infamous "Alien" -- that only continues to grow and evolve.

    "Our invention is extremely resilient in terms of its ability to adapt to different networks, clients and protocols," Manes told NewsFactor. "As long as a user can sign on to a network and trade files -- even anonymously -- our solution is effective."

    So effective, in fact, that the inventors and the university "are commercializing the technology and exploring new options for licensing the patent," Olson told NewsFactor.

    Hale testified twice before Congress last year on the hazards of file-sharing networks and sees the situation getting worse, in spite of the industry lawsuit onslaught.

    "It really is a massive problem, and one that calls for a combination of legislation, technology and awareness," Hale said. "But as far as technology goes, we believe we may have the most viable countermeasure that will stand the test of time."
  • tintin
    Getting Somewhere
    • Jun 2004
    • 184

    #2
    thats fucked

    why don't artist just make the cd prices cheaper?

    Comment

    • swedetech
      Gold Gabber
      • Jun 2004
      • 990

      #3
      Its not the artists Sherlock!

      Its the record companies...
      ---------------


      check out http://www.stockmonk.net for all your graphic needs!!! and www.jnmedia.com for custom websites, animation, 3d and more...

      Comment

      • tintin
        Getting Somewhere
        • Jun 2004
        • 184

        #4
        well you know what I mean JACKASS

        Comment

        • Dhar_2
          meat and potatoes
          • Jun 2004
          • 18924

          #5
          bastards, at it again.

          y cant they just get over it. they're bloody loaded anyway

          Comment

          • neoee
            Platinum Poster
            • Jun 2004
            • 1266

            #6
            Why do they even bother? Its just a matter of time before someone comes up with an idea to combat this. Don't they realize they are out numbered? I'm sure the hacker community will show them as soon as this starts to become a problem on the p2p networks. Maybe a checksum, md5 kinda setup or even a trust based system (where everyone on the system has a trusted certificate kinda like PKI), so that only verified/trusted users can share.
            "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." -Benjamin Franklin

            Comment

            • nbpgt
              Platinum Poster
              • Jun 2004
              • 1044

              #7
              at least they didnt name SS in the targets..

              Comment

              • thezzapper
                Gold Gabber
                • Jun 2004
                • 813

                #8
                record companies!
                sigpic

                Comment

                • beto
                  Gold Gabber
                  • Jun 2004
                  • 964

                  #9
                  Thats a waste of a CS degree...

                  Comment

                  • hypoluxxa
                    Are you Kidding me??
                    • Jun 2004
                    • 3371

                    #10
                    I don't care either way because I never went to any of those sites anyway, and I don't believe in stealing movies, or music you can actually buy.

                    Comment

                    • nbpgt
                      Platinum Poster
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 1044

                      #11
                      yeah im not real big on the movies thing anywayz.. it seems to be to much of a hassle to steal a dvd you can rent for 4 dollahs.

                      Comment

                      • rms1k
                        Getting Somewhere
                        • Jun 2004
                        • 112

                        #12
                        yea you can renet and burn DVDs all you want. One time renting!!
                        this clown should be hunted and shot for this type of program! he he
                        I mean did the RIAA put him up to it or something. Who in their right mind would waste thier own time on a malicious thing as to fuck with P2P networks.
                        anyway, SS seems to be out of the lime light so far. It won't be long though.
                        Gotta keep on keepin' on
                        slsk username rms3k
                        message me to be put on my list, all ms peeps welcome

                        Comment

                        • bananapeel
                          Addiction started
                          • Jun 2004
                          • 471

                          #13
                          Re: fake p2p files?

                          Originally posted by nbpgt
                          The recording industry reports that P2P piracy in 2003 cost record labels and artists some US$700 million in lost compact-disk sales.
                          How much of this $700million is contributed by progressive trance????
                          I reckon very little.

                          I'm thinking the main problem they have is with mainstream music, ie pop, rap, r'n'b, etc.

                          Comment

                          • MJDub
                            Are you Kidding me??
                            • Jun 2004
                            • 2765

                            #14
                            Re: fake p2p files?

                            Originally posted by bananapeel
                            Originally posted by nbpgt
                            The recording industry reports that P2P piracy in 2003 cost record labels and artists some US$700 million in lost compact-disk sales.
                            How much of this $700million is contributed by progressive trance????
                            I reckon very little.

                            I'm thinking the main problem they have is with mainstream music, ie pop, rap, r'n'b, etc.
                            Progressive trance??
                            http://www.myspace.com/mjdubmusic

                            You can't have manslaughter without laughter.

                            "Son," he said without preamble, "never trust a man who doesn't drink because he's probably a self-righteous sort, a man who thinks he knows right from wrong all the time. Some of them are good men, but in the name of goodness, they cause most of the suffering in the world. They're the judges, the meddlers. And, son, never trust a man who drinks but refuses to get drunk. They're usually afraid of something deep down inside, either that they're a coward or a fool or mean and violent. You can't trust a man who's afraid of himself. But sometimes, son, you can trust a man who occasionally kneels before a toilet. The chances are that he is learning something about humility and his natural human foolishness, about how to survive himself. It's damned hard for a man to take himself too seriously when he's heaving his guts into a dirty toilet bowl."

                            Comment

                            • hypoluxxa
                              Are you Kidding me??
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 3371

                              #15
                              Progressive trance??


                              How about non cheez dance music, as in every genre of House and Techno.

                              Comment

                              Working...