Republicans?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dtgunslinger
    Addiction started
    • Nov 2004
    • 352

    #16
    Re: Republicans?

    The smartest quote I have heard by a Bush so far has been Jeb, "My hands are tied. I cannot go against a court order or the Constitution." (DTGunslinger paraphrases quite nicely)

    Did you think a Bush could be so smart and step aside? Not me.

    Let her go, no matter what anyone stands to gain. Terri deserves to go to whatever you believe in as an afterlife. If God, Allah, Buddah (insert your denominational deity here) is around for her than she desreves to be with him. No self respecting believer in faith would deny her that, except all of those assholes on Capital hill right now.
    Not living my life to see if I get into heaven or hell, just how long I'll have to spend in purgatory.

    Comment

    • mylexicon
      Addiction started
      • Jun 2004
      • 339

      #17
      Re: Republicans?

      Originally posted by toasty
      As a former card-carrying member of the republican party who got tired of non-republican behavior, I've got to know if any of you are starting to get irked with your party yet. For a party that is fundamentally based upon an idea that government ought not intrude upon citizens and states' rights, Bush and his buddies seem to be doing the exact opposite. Honestly, holding an emergency session of congress to push through a bill to see to it that the Terry Schiavo case, which has already been litigated ad infinitum in state court, would also be routed through the federal system, is the polar opposite of the party I once called my own.
      No I'm not the least bit fed up. I have absolutely no interest in the case or
      the gov's role, her husband has custody if he wants to kill her instead of
      giving custody to the parents i guess i have to let it be. All power tends to
      corrupt, absolute power corrupts absolutely----Lord Acton. That quote shows
      that this isn't really political at all. If you give the government power it's going
      to abuse it. It amazes me that with the events in Iraq and now Republican
      interference in private family affairs that democrats still don't realize the benefits
      of limited government. The writing is on the goddamn wall. As long as the
      government has money, and lots of it......it will have the power to coerce,
      influence, persuade, and deceive the American people. It's not rocket science.
      Democrats tax money from companies and the wealthy, use it to buy
      votes through grotesquely ineffecient social programs, then they lead poor
      and middle class workers into the quagmire of class warfare.........that is the
      real American tragedy.

      P.S. lets not forget that the Schiavo case is clearly driven by the media, politicians
      don't really care they are just responding to the media assault.
      Be a vegan......eat freedom fries..

      Comment

      • toasty
        Sir Toastiness
        • Jun 2004
        • 6585

        #18
        Re: Republicans?

        Originally posted by mylexicon
        It amazes me that with the events in Iraq and now Republican interference in private family affairs that democrats still don't realize the benefits of limited government.
        I can't speak for deomcrats on the whole, but speaking for myself, I absolutely realize the benefits of limited government. I just wish the party that professes to have limited government at its center would actually practice it more regularly. That's the whole point of the post -- the right's intrusion into this poor family's private affairs is very un-Republican.

        Originally posted by mylexicon
        P.S. lets not forget that the Schiavo case is clearly driven by the media, politicians don't really care they are just responding to the media assault.
        If I'm not mistaken, the media hadn't really taken hold of this story until Congress held an emergency session, and Bush actually took a break from his vacation, to see to it that this case made its way into the federal system. Since then, the media has been all over it, but the suggestion that politicians -- at least those on the right -- have been above the fray ignores what has actually happened over the last two weeks. Whether the politicians actually care about Terri Schiavo or if they are just pushing a political agenda is of course a debatable point, but I don't see Delay, Frist or Bush as a victim of the media here...

        Comment

        • Localizer
          Platinum Poster
          • Jul 2004
          • 2021

          #19
          Re: Republicans?

          This situation makes me ashamed to be called an American. I can't believe the family continues (and for the last time today in Atlanta) to push the courts and the politicians to show support for Terry. It doesn't take common sense to know that she's a vegitable and cannot act on her own free will. I can only see countries and allies mocking us for such ridiculous matters.
          Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so.
          -Bertrand Russell

          Comment

          • fishingnut
            Addiction started
            • Nov 2004
            • 263

            #20
            Re: Republicans?

            where talking about the right of a mother and father and sister, and brother, to keep there daughter or sister alive. geez people can't you look threw all this jesus and political bull shit. even thou i feel different and would have pulled the plug. i understand how hard it is for people to let go of someone who is family. just imagine these where your parents, and they where trying to keep you alive, for what ever reason. wouldn't you want someone to stand up for you if you couldn't do it yourself. and from what i understand terrie has no clue on what going on, so what's the difference if you keep her alive or not she doesn't know the difference.
            Don't post anything you wouldn't want yo mamma or the 'feds' to read.

            Comment

            • toasty
              Sir Toastiness
              • Jun 2004
              • 6585

              #21
              Re: Republicans?

              Originally posted by fishingnut
              where talking about the right of a mother and father and sister, and brother, to keep there daughter or sister alive. geez people can't you look threw all this jesus and political bull shit. even thou i feel different and would have pulled the plug. i understand how hard it is for people to let go of someone who is family. just imagine these where your parents, and they where trying to keep you alive, for what ever reason. wouldn't you want someone to stand up for you if you couldn't do it yourself. and from what i understand terrie has no clue on what going on, so what's the difference if you keep her alive or not she doesn't know the difference.
              I don't necessarily disagree with you -- it would be really tough to pull the plug on someone I love, regardless of their condition. I'm just saying that the government has no business participating in this whole mess regardless of what side of the issue you happen to fall on. Ditto that for the media. It's a private matter, and the saddest thing about all of this, apart from the obvious fact that Terri will lose her life, is the circus it has become.

              Comment

              • fishingnut
                Addiction started
                • Nov 2004
                • 263

                #22
                Re: Republicans?

                all the government did was put there face in the news, i don't think they had any other motive. i also feel that we didn't get the hole story from either side, the politicians and the media just picked and chosed what they tought would get the people all riled up. but hey that's nothing new.
                Don't post anything you wouldn't want yo mamma or the 'feds' to read.

                Comment

                • face
                  Getting Somewhere
                  • Jun 2004
                  • 179

                  #23
                  Re: Republicans?

                  The Los Angeles Times reported on March 27 that when DeLay's father was "badly injured in a freak accident at his home," leaving him "in a coma, kept alive by intravenous lines and oxygen equipment ... the congressman quietly joined the sad family consensus to let his father die." The paper noted DeLay's prominence in advocating the reinsertion of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube.
                  what a scumbag...

                  DJ Mixes | Music Reviews | Podcast | iTunes Podcast | RSS Feed | SoundCloud

                  Comment

                  • fishingnut
                    Addiction started
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 263

                    #24
                    Re: Republicans?

                    Originally posted by face
                    The Los Angeles Times reported on March 27 that when DeLay's father was "badly injured in a freak accident at his home," leaving him "in a coma, kept alive by intravenous lines and oxygen equipment ... the congressman quietly joined the sad family consensus to let his father die." The paper noted DeLay's prominence in advocating the reinsertion of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube.
                    what a scumbag...
                    it might sound hipocritical but why, it says him and the FAMILY came to a consenses, the only person, that i know that wanted terri dead was her husband, her family wanted to keep her alive. am i wrong or just misinformed.
                    Don't post anything you wouldn't want yo mamma or the 'feds' to read.

                    Comment

                    • face
                      Getting Somewhere
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 179

                      #25
                      Re: Republicans?

                      Originally posted by fishingnut
                      Originally posted by face
                      The Los Angeles Times reported on March 27 that when DeLay's father was "badly injured in a freak accident at his home," leaving him "in a coma, kept alive by intravenous lines and oxygen equipment ... the congressman quietly joined the sad family consensus to let his father die." The paper noted DeLay's prominence in advocating the reinsertion of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube.
                      what a scumbag...
                      it might sound hipocritical but why, it says him and the FAMILY came to a consenses, the only person, that i know that wanted terri dead was her husband, her family wanted to keep her alive. am i wrong or just misinformed.
                      yes, you are right. but the people arguing to keep her alive are not arguing for a consensus (which may lead, like in the case of delay's family, to the pulling of all feeding tubes). delay and other republicans want to keep her alive because it's morally right, and so on (i.e., to appease the christian right to which they owe so much).

                      DJ Mixes | Music Reviews | Podcast | iTunes Podcast | RSS Feed | SoundCloud

                      Comment

                      • thesightless
                        Someone will marry me. Hell Yeah!
                        • Jun 2004
                        • 13567

                        #26
                        Re: Republicans?

                        well, she passed early this morning...

                        god/allah/budda/yahweh whatever better do her right. shame her life was a fucking political tool for the end of it..

                        i can only hope that after all of this, she did indeed want a DNR and i hope her husband doesnt turn out to be a shady character. that would really make things worse for the family.
                        your life is an occasion, rise to it.

                        Join My Chant. new mix. april 09. dirty fuck house.
                        download that. deep shit listed there

                        my dick is its own superhero.

                        Comment

                        • face
                          Getting Somewhere
                          • Jun 2004
                          • 179

                          #27
                          Re: Republicans?

                          Originally posted by thesightless
                          well, she passed early this morning...

                          god/allah/budda/yahweh whatever better do her right. shame her life was a fucking political tool for the end of it..

                          i can only hope that after all of this, she did indeed want a DNR and i hope her husband doesnt turn out to be a shady character. that would really make things worse for the family.
                          heh, well technically god and allah are the same.

                          anyway, jesse jackson is on cnn now. this ought to be good. i wonder how long it takes for our media to completely forget about this whole story. i give it 24 hours? man, they are so fickle.

                          as for the husband, he will probably get a nice talk show or reality tv show for all his troubles.

                          DJ Mixes | Music Reviews | Podcast | iTunes Podcast | RSS Feed | SoundCloud

                          Comment

                          • fishingnut
                            Addiction started
                            • Nov 2004
                            • 263

                            #28
                            Re: Republicans?

                            moral issue my ass, they are just trying to get votes, he's going to say anything that might get him some more votes. he new he can jump on the christian bad wagon.
                            Don't post anything you wouldn't want yo mamma or the 'feds' to read.

                            Comment

                            • fishingnut
                              Addiction started
                              • Nov 2004
                              • 263

                              #29
                              Re: Republicans?

                              Originally posted by face
                              Originally posted by thesightless
                              well, she passed early this morning...

                              god/allah/budda/yahweh whatever better do her right. shame her life was a fucking political tool for the end of it..

                              i can only hope that after all of this, she did indeed want a DNR and i hope her husband doesnt turn out to be a shady character. that would really make things worse for the family.
                              heh, well technically god and allah are the same.

                              anyway, jesse jackson is on cnn now. this ought to be good. i wonder how long it takes for our media to completely forget about this whole story. i give it 24 hours? man, they are so fickle.

                              as for the husband, he will probably get a nice talk show or reality tv show for all his troubles.
                              don't forget the made for tv movie that will probably hit every network
                              Don't post anything you wouldn't want yo mamma or the 'feds' to read.

                              Comment

                              • acmatos
                                Getting warmed up
                                • Jun 2004
                                • 96

                                #30
                                Re: Republicans?

                                Despite what most of you think there are people that didn't view Terri as a political tool. I was opposed to removing her feeding tubes from the beginning, not for political purposes but because I respect her life and her parents wishes. If her family is willing to take care of her, then what's the problem?? What kind of a sick person spends 13 years of his life trying to make sure someone dies? Oh because he loved her so much and wanted to see her wishes through?..that's bullshit! If he loved her so much, why is it that he has a new family? I say there's money behind this.

                                Also, many of you think that the Judiciary is some kind of untouchable entity. This is entirely false. The judiciary is there to interpret laws made by legislators. The judges had every right to make this decision now, but the legislature(Congress) has every right to change the laws at any time. It's called Statutory Reversal and is one of the checks(among others) that is placed on the judiciary by the Constitution. That how our system works. Until now, judges had never been regarded in this way. We've been conned into thinking that they are above the law and, in fact, make the law. Regardless of what political side you are on, this is a serious problem that has to be addressed. Otherwise, all our rights will be jeopardized by the courts.

                                You all can be glad now that Terri's dead and the "circus" is over.
                                Don't blame me, I'm just the messenger.

                                Comment

                                Working...