If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
don't mention this gem, not even close !. Talking about involve3r individually, transitions are not smooth enough, it sounds like the man didn't even put his hand on them.
wow the reviews are totally opposite on amazon uk from what i have been reading on ms....here are a few...
and just when you thought that the genius couldnt better involver 2.... BANG... he comes up with this masterpiece ! this is sasha at his absolute finest and one of the most beautiful mixes i have heard in a very long time ! a must have in anybodys cd collection who appreciates good electronic music !
After the lukewarm response to his second installment it's pleasing to find that he's come back stronger & better than ever. I'd place this alongside his first in the series, so be safe in the knowledge that you're purchasing a product of absolute quality. Packaging is a rather functional tri-fold which is a bit unusual for the series, but nevertheless it houses the 2 discs exceptionally well.
wow, so this is it? this is what he has been doing for the last couple of months (years)? I mean wtf, seriously???
Still, I am not sure if I listened to the real thing (download oh oh) or someone mislabeled the file. In case it was Involver 3 I - and wow it hurts a bit - have to agree with most of what has been written so far. It so was NOT worth the wait!
- The tracks are average at best. (Well, the second half has its moments (by the second) but it absolutely fails to impress at all!)
- I CANNOT stand the vocals (actually it's distorted snippets) on most of the tracks.
- The sequencing (one should avoid the word mixing) is laughable. Again, wtf? Who has done this? If it took someone (whomever) more than an hour I would seriously challenge his studio skills. Overall what is the point of the sequencing here anyway? The whole thing does not tell a story - or did I miss the plot?
I wonder, what was the initial idea of Involver again? I vaguely remember there was some (next level?) concept behind it once?
To be fair I have not listened to the beatless versions so far but then again may I dare to ask - Why should I?
One should not laud the past ... but in this case I can't resist. Anyone remembers this?
Tried in the car last night.. thinking it would help.. couldn't get into it
Originally posted by trick12
the artwork was done by one of my good friends
Great work..!
Originally posted by sbando
The Northern Exposure comps are also a studio re-creation, with heavy input from studio gurus, because that was considered as state-of-the-art if not groundbreaking back than.
For some reason in my naďve mind there they were Sasha and JD behind a deck mixing away NE1, which I am sure happened, but I didn't know that there were more people involved. What you are saying somehow puts those amazing live mixes we get once in a while in perspective..
Here's a copy on soundcloud... an early attempt at sharing the lowdepth version. It'll get pulled soon. It already is getting link blocked on google search.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment