Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

http://www.debunking911.com/towers.htm

Fireproofing key to Twin Towers' collapse - tech - 06 April 2005 - New Scientist

McGraw-Hill Construction | ENR - Study Absolves Twin Tower Trusses, Fireproofing

Is that on top of your bean can theory? Or is it instead of? lol

[floridaorange]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

Rough week guvna?

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

Still waiting for the sleeper cells nom nom nom nom

[res0nat0r]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

ZZz. This bores me. BBL.

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

lol didn't think so

So here we have, in this weeks news, parcel bombs sent to Forces recruitment centres. Only who did it? Even newsnight where sceptical, oh it was the Irish!

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

The what rish?

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

The Irish, no forensics, no investigation, no one claiming responsibility, it was the Irish. lOl. It's almost like it couldn't have been no one else lOl

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

No parcel bombs dispatched from the Uk gov post room that day so it defo wasn't al Qaeda LoL. paddy's taking the piss

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

She obviously didn't have fire proofing

[FFF]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

Looks like the Alpha Male is back LOL

[bobjuice]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

Science is mere speculation. Opinions of the brainwashed masses are FACT. Hahahaha

[bobjuice]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

As shpira said, "the idiots are winning" LOL

[thebanned1]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

Is that on top of your bean can theory? Or is it instead of? lol

hard scientific proof... where is your's in the conspiracy theory that has obviously brainwashed your mind into thinking the government are responsible for the killing of over 3000 of their own people in aid to gain valuable oil contacts blah blah blah

[thebanned1]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

i mean that is a sound theory, doesn't sound crazy in the slightest... oh whats the word for it... not black op something else

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

Fireproofing key to Twin Towers' collapse - tech - 06 April 2005 - New Scientist

I'm guessing you didn't bother reading this before you posted it

. But some experts remain unconvinced by the study's conclusions. James Quintiere, of the University of Maryland, US, says he does not understand how fireproof insulation could have been dislodged from the buildings' floors and columns.

"Everything I see points to the fact that there may not have been enough insulation," he told New Scientist, adding that the fuel loads used in the report's calculations may have been too low.


And Barbara Lane, leader of the Structural Fire Group at UK engineering company Arup, adds: "[We] don't believe that [the dislodging of fireproof material] has been substantiated in any of the published data to date." She adds that it is difficult to extrapolate heat assessments of a material to what might happen when it is actually in place in a building.


Lane also questions recommendations concerning the use of thermally-resistant window assemblies to slow the spread of fire. "This is of considerable concern as even this form of glass can fail under direct flame impingement," she says.


The complete report is comprised of more than 10,000 pages, the preliminary 3400 pages of which were released on Tuesday. The remainder of the study is planned for release in July 2005, when the institute will also make recommendations concerning building design and construction.