Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

[Illuminate]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

To a certain degree I still question WTC 7. Just amazing how burned rubbish brought a whole building down. Have not thoroughly started going through the NIST report yet, something yet to fulfil in the time available.

Would there ever be a probable scientific explanation for it? Possibly none, I personally believe physics questions the probability of it all.

[Illuminate]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

But then again, as accurate as science may be, first hand evidence will outweigh most hypothesis. No one really has mentioned anything about this or I have not been aware of any first hand evidence of WTC 7. Apart from a single line repeated in some neo-liberal movie about they heard 'a big bang'.

[thebanned1]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

you're talking to me like i have all the answers, you're talking like it was shot down, you'll never know this, maybe the terrorists got spooked, if they did either way they knew they would die no matter what and deliberately crashed the plane... i don't buy into this " brave hostages stormed the cockpit"


how many people/terrorists on board that flight do you suggest had aviation knowledge

truth is you're never going to know so were condemned to discussing ( ok mostly arguing ) about it on forums and shit ... the "official" story is never going to be made public simply because it was used as a way to justify a war... this only riles people up and fuels cover up/false flag theories

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

But then again, as accurate as science may be, first hand evidence will outweigh most hypothesis. No one really has mentioned anything about this or I have not been aware of any first hand evidence of WTC 7. Apart from a single line repeated in some neo-liberal movie about they heard 'a big bang'.

Actually there is video footage of the so called big bang. I can dig it out if you want?

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

you're talking to me like i have all the answers, you're talking like it was shot down, you'll never know this, maybe the terrorists got spooked, if they did either way they knew they would die no matter what and deliberately crashed the plane... i don't buy into this " brave hostages stormed the cockpit"


how many people/terrorists on board that flight do you suggest had aviation knowledge

truth is you're never going to know so were condemned to discussing ( ok mostly arguing ) about it on forums and shit ... the "official" story is never going to be made public simply because it was used as a way to justify a war... this only riles people up and fuels cover up/false flag theories

Actually I'm talking to you like the passengers brought the plane down. Probably the one thing the government couldn't predict. The plane was probably brought down as a result of the passengers trying to regain control of the cock pit.

[thebanned1]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

Actually I'm talking to you like the passengers brought the plane down. Probably the one thing the government couldn't predict.

its possible but it's too hollywood for my tastes

too bad story has to have a hero ending.... sooooo freedom

[audrey_w]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

i don't know about you but when the plane hits i see a lot of hot material flying through the air, i would say that if a piece of this smashed through an office window its most probably hot enough to start a fire

I wouldn't dispute the possibility that the debris you speak of could start a fire.
What we're talking about here is the simultaneous collapse of all four corners of a steel framed building.

[thebanned1]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

I wouldn't dispute the possibility that the debris you speak of could start a fire.
What we're talking about here is the simultaneous collapse of all four corners of a steel framed building.

watch the youtube again.. there is a huge fireball, considering building 7 was 350 feet away from the north tower, idk maybe its possible it was hit by that... like i said i don't understand building 7 either....building 7 didn't fall straight down, there is a picture showing all the damaged buildings around it after the collapse, it just looks like it did in the most popular video, the whole point of a controlled demolition is to bring a building down on its own imprint to stop it from damaging things around it

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

I think you will find most people will disagree with you on that one, The building fell into its foot print, it didn't topple over.

[thebanned1]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

this was the only one i could find

[thebanned1]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

I think you will find most people will disagree with you on that one, The building fell into its foot print, it didn't topple over.

i think i,ll be proven correct with the above picture

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

i think i,ll be proven correct with the above picture

Err I think not, yes the other building sustained some damage due to its proximity to building 7. However the loins share of the building is in its foot print.

[King Coe]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

You're clutching at straws with that one

[thebanned1]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

the majority of it is in its footprint yes... it still proves nothing, these building were a unique design for the time, they were also old and probably not maintained properly... i go back to the "jesus will come back, the bible says so" post if you're saying building 7 alone proves your theory

[thebanned1]

Re: Building Doesn't Fall by Fire???

You're clutching at straws with that one

i,m clutching at straws with you on this full stop... how many times have we argued ( and others ) about this whole thing? where exactly is it getting us ?