Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

[TheTadgerBadger]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

not a chance in hell the jet fuel went in one go and building 7 was damaged by parts flying from the initial impact before it caught fire

What you think that there was a burning vat of jet fuel sat at the top of the building. LOL. Have you also forgotten about the woman that was stood in the impact zone, supposedly while your jet fuel was burning.

[TheTadgerBadger]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

yea i heard NIST re built the twin towers from the original blue prints and gave it 50 years worth of wear and tare then flew 2 large passenger jets into the buildings

Really. Actually they just tried to weaken the metal, something they could not recreate. You stick with your man with the metal rod banned1.

[thebanned1]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

What you think that there was a burning vat of jet fuel sat at the top of the building. LOL. Have you also forgotten about the woman that was stood in the impact zone, supposedly while your jet fuel was burning.

same old shit chris just a different day

bush done it and got away with it

[TheTadgerBadger]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

Glad to see you are now seeing sense banned1, welcome to enlightenment. Watch out for them sleeper cells today, they are bound to have something up their sleeves. What with it being Christmas and all. LOL

[thebanned1]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

Glad to see you are now seeing sense banned1, welcome to enlightenment. Watch out for them sleeper cells today, they are bound to have something up their sleeves. What with it being Christmas and all. LOL

[sakio pod]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

Look at the stupid redneck blacksmith makes no sense why World Trade Center seven came down! The fires must have been too hot!

[thebanned1]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

Look at the stupid redneck blacksmith makes no sense why World Trade Center seven came down! The fires must have been too hot!

worked in the steel industry have you ?

[Devil's Dandruff]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

Just out of interest banned1, what do you think the blacksmith heated the steal rod up with, how long did it take and was the whole rod heated?

[floridaorange]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

[thebanned1]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

Just out of interest banned1, what do you think the blacksmith heated the steal rod up with, how long did it take and was the whole rod heated?

once itr got to a certain temp it would of got no hotter

[Devil's Dandruff]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

once itr got to a certain temp it would of got no hotter

Sorry. I don't know what 'itr' is. And that wasn't the question I asked. I asked what you think he heated the rod in? How long do you think he heated it for? And was the whole rod heated?

[thebanned1]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

if you watch the video he answers all your questions himself so why should i have to repeat him... of course there would of been heat across the whole of the rod, its why he is wearing gloves to protect himself from a burn

[Devil's Dandruff]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

if you watch the video he answers all your questions himself so why should i have to repeat him... of course there would of been heat across the whole of the rod, its why he is wearing gloves to protect himself from a burn

He doesn't say how long he heated it for. Yes he does have to wear gloves (unlike that lady who managed to stand in the impact zone on 9/11), but if the whole piece was heated the same the whole rod would be glowing orange (which it is not). He then goes further by putting the rod in the anvil the wrong way around and applies leverage at the wrong end.

[barski]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

But hot metal is weaker then cold metal...
Could still be an inside job though.

[thebanned1]

Re: Guy Disproves A 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 2 Minutes

He doesn't say how long he heated it for. Yes he does have to wear gloves (unlike that lady who managed to stand in the impact zone on 9/11), but if the whole piece was heated the same the whole rod would be glowing orange (which it is not). He then goes further by putting the rod in the anvil the wrong way around and applies leverage at the wrong end.

doesn't matter how long he heated it for...look i,ll level with you, that video could be bullshit, it could be cheap Chinese metal which wouldn't take that long to heat but it still proves the basic fact that when heated and load bearing ( in the case of the twin tower 100's of tons ) that structurally it is weak but then if you take the fact that the buildings structure was hit but a modern passenger jet travelling probably travelling close to thew speed of sound then you are in a whole different ball park all together