Coronavirus

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Weizy
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    ^so its a bandaid for a bullethole! In the immortal words of our president, SAD!

    Here's a so-called calculator to figure out how much you and yours will receive:

    Omni Calculator logo

    Leave a comment:


  • ddr
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    gotta love America.. the land of corporate freedom and individual asylum

    "The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a sweeping suspension of its enforcement of environmental laws Thursday, telling companies they would not need to meet environmental standards during the coronavirus outbreak.

    The temporary policy, for which the EPA has set no end date, would allow any number of industries to skirt environmental laws, with the agency saying it will not “seek penalties for noncompliance with routine monitoring and reporting obligations.”


    EPA suspends enforcement of environmental laws amid coronavirus | TheHill

    Leave a comment:


  • ddr
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Originally posted by Weizy
    Did I read that correctly that for any individual who filed for income over $75K (and families $150K) you get $50 less for every X amount over those thresholds?
    that is correct, and i think individuals get nothing if they had made >150k gross (doubled for married or domestic partnerships) on their most recently filed tax return (i believe 2018-2019 tax years are the looking glass). so say for example a contractor made >150k and now is out of work.. he or she would get nothing. hopefully they paid enough into unemployment so they can get that benefit under the stimulus but no stimulus check.

    Leave a comment:


  • Weizy
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Originally posted by Micko
    Hope everyone is in good health

    I've been of the radar. Kids at home, the missus out of work now - it's frightening how each and everyone of us is being effected by it

    Look after yourselves folks
    Thanks, Micko. What is your wife's occupation?

    My wife's dental office has suspended operations so she's lost her full income, but luckily she is getting about 50% of her income from unemployment now...

    Leave a comment:


  • Weizy
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Originally posted by ddr
    the stimulus isnt going to do jack shit as a whole. and when the funds are needed by people now, they wont get anything until May.. at that is at the earliest. $1,200 per person is a joke and it just sheds light on the government not taking scientist's and experts knowledge to heart and realizing this shit wont be over by April. i do agree we need something but this is nothing compared to what we need in reality. the unemployment piece is good. almost 3.2 million unemployed in a matter of weeks, there is no easy flick of a switch for this one.

    this is only the beginning of it, and with trumps delayed bullshit and downplaying it in the beginning.. we missed a huge boat for stopping the spread early. now it is just playing catch up.

    stay safe out there everyone, ignore our President, and read the facts.
    Did I read that correctly that for any individual who filed for income over $75K (and families $150K) you get $50 less for every X amount over those thresholds?

    Leave a comment:


  • Micko
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Hope everyone is in good health

    I've been of the radar. Kids at home, the missus out of work now - it's frightening how each and everyone of us is being effected by it

    Look after yourselves folks

    Leave a comment:


  • DIDI
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Screen Shot 2020-03-27 at 9.13.44 pm.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • DIDI
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    ^^ Your stimulus is very similar to our stimulus , both have delayed payments.

    Donald Trump certainly hasn't done you any favours.
    Last edited by DIDI; March 27, 2020, 06:11:21 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ddr
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Originally posted by Weizy
    True, but it’ll get done. It has to!
    the stimulus isnt going to do jack shit as a whole. and when the funds are needed by people now, they wont get anything until May.. at that is at the earliest. $1,200 per person is a joke and it just sheds light on the government not taking scientist's and experts knowledge to heart and realizing this shit wont be over by April. i do agree we need something but this is nothing compared to what we need in reality. the unemployment piece is good. almost 3.2 million unemployed in a matter of weeks, there is no easy flick of a switch for this one.

    this is only the beginning of it, and with trumps delayed bullshit and downplaying it in the beginning.. we missed a huge boat for stopping the spread early. now it is just playing catch up.

    stay safe out there everyone, ignore our President, and read the facts.

    Leave a comment:


  • feather
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Spit On, Yelled At, Attacked: Chinese-Americans Fear for Their Safety


    Thanks to agent orange.

    Leave a comment:


  • Weizy
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Originally posted by ddr
    It hasn't been signed yet.
    True, but it’ll get done. It has to!

    Leave a comment:


  • ddr
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Originally posted by Weizy
    Americans --- we have a relief PACKAGE :-)
    It hasn't been signed yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • Weizy
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Americans --- we have a relief PACKAGE :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • DIDI
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    Just in case you hit a paywall

    Peter Doherty won the Nobel prize in medicine for his work on the immune system. "I'm a disease and death guy," is how he explains it to the lay person.
    So he knows his science. And he isn't afraid to criticise governments that don't respect it. Climate science, for instance.


    So what does the eminent Melbourne-based immunologist think of the Australian responses to the coronavirus so far?
    "Basically, government is stepping up to the plate," he says. The federal government, he quips, is "fit for purpose for a short-term emergency - they're quick to lock people up."


    The strict new measures will not produce any instant slowdown in the number of reported cases, he expects.
    The number of new infections detected in Australia has accelerated exponentially. It was doubling every five or six days a couple of weeks ago. It's now doubling every three days.
    "We may see an upward trajectory for another week - a lot of the people on Bondi may have been infected," says Doherty, who literally wrote the book on the topic - "Pandemics: What Everyone Needs to Know" - in 2013.
    But he expects that the measures introduced this week will work: "With a lag of a week or so, because the average time to [display] symptoms is five to six days and maybe longer," and only people showing symptoms have been allowed tests so far.


    So a short-term surge is already baked in.
    "I think the steps announced by the Prime Minister and the premiers will dampen this down. I would expect to see the curve flatten in the next couple of weeks, see it start to come down," he says.
    Governments have said that they aim to "flatten the curve", meaning to slow the rate of new infections, by controlling gatherings, closing non-essential businesses and ordering social distancing.
    "That will mean a lot more people will survive because they will have access to ventilators and proper clinical care over the next 12 to 18 months" in the intensive care wards of the hospital system while awaiting the arrival of a vaccine.
    Professor Doherty cites the example of the effectiveness of such measures in US state of Washington. It was the site of the first big outbreak of COVID-19 in America.


    But after Governor Jay Inslee imposed the same social controls as the Morrison government has announced, plus closing the schools, some 10 days ago, the outbreak appears to have been brought in check: "They expected a big surge in cases, but nothing came."
    Doherty has been pleased with the intensification of testing in Australia in recent days.
    "It's now a matter of time, of numbers and of human behaviour", says Doherty, patron of the Doherty Institute at the University of Melbourne.
    Professor Doherty, who trained as a vet, is involved in strategy and advice on the research effort, including the search for a vaccine.


    On government support for urgent new research, he says: "Federal and state governments are doing pretty much everything asked of them to drive this research, clinical and diagnostic effort forward."
    The Doherty Institute, one of the world's research leaders and the first lab outside China to decode the COVID-19's structure and distribute the data to labs worldwide, has received federal and state funding for research and "a lot of money" from private donors and philanthropists, he says.
    Important donors include the Chinese Australian community, the Ramsay Foundation, Chinese billionaire Jack Ma of Alibaba who gave $US3.2 million, and an anonymous donor who gave $1 million.
    "We are moving faster on this than on anything in human history. One vaccine in the US is already on trial, it's already gone into people's arms, and the University of Queensland vaccine is being progressed here and with CSIRO," he said.
    "Batches are being made by CSIRO now on a scale that will allow us to move rapidly to animal trials and then human trials." Indeed, says Professor Doherty, "it's already in animals and is progressing well".


    The US and Australian vaccines "are two completely different technologies, very new, and there are many more being trialled around the world." New ideas are being offered every day, he says.

    Testing of any new vaccines is needed, even though it will slow the process, says Doherty. "There's some concern that if we don't tailor this right, you might make it worse in some conditions, so there has to be careful testing."
    Expert opinion commonly specifies a 12 to 18-month wait for an effective vaccine to be widely available. "I'm hopeful that we in the global community could be quicker, but that might just be my optimism."
    Other urgent clinical work is needed, not just a vaccine, he says. For example, "we need a rapid antibody test for people who've had the virus and recovered".


    Why? Because such people, who may not have shown any symptoms and not know that they've had the virus, "are perfectly okay to go out and work and live and do anything - they won't spread the disease".
    Some 20-30 per cent of the population probably will fall into this category eventually. They could constitute an speedily available workforce and alleviate the economic problem.
    And once you have people who've recovered, "you can bleed them, separate off their serum, and give that serum back to vulnerable people". It can be used as a preventative measure to protect people from the virus, so-called "passive immunisation," while a vaccine is still being developed.
    While Professor Doherty is deeply involved in all this lab work, he isn't in the lab himself. He's working from home. "People like me, 79 years old and with high blood pressure, still have to be very, very careful." He should know.

    Leave a comment:


  • DIDI
    replied
    Re: Coronavirus

    This Nobel prize winner has some interesting facts for us

    Leave a comment:

Working...