Re: Nick Warren - Springtime Mix
The file Nick Warren made available is 201kbps.
Spring Mix.jpg
TM version (upscaled transcode) is 272kbps.
kahlez.jpg
Does it make sense converting a file to a higher audio bitrate?
Reference: https://superuser.com/questions/5938...-audio-bitrate
The file Nick Warren made available is 201kbps.
Spring Mix.jpg
TM version (upscaled transcode) is 272kbps.
kahlez.jpg
Does it make sense converting a file to a higher audio bitrate?
In the general case this will not usually result in higher quality audio. The basic reason being that you cannot manufacture sounds that aren't there in the original file.
In the best case the only result will be, as you suggest, larger files.
In the worst case the files could even be of worse quality as the second lossy encoder is tying to encode the output from a previous lossy encoder. You will be encoding noise as well as real data.
In the best case the only result will be, as you suggest, larger files.
In the worst case the files could even be of worse quality as the second lossy encoder is tying to encode the output from a previous lossy encoder. You will be encoding noise as well as real data.
Comment