Sam Alito -- Mainstream?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • toasty
    Sir Toastiness
    • Jun 2004
    • 6585

    Sam Alito -- Mainstream?

    Who knows, actually. But we do know this: if it becomes clear that Alito would vote to overturn Roe, over half of the country would like to see him not get confirmed on that basis, and exactly half think that a fillibuster would be appropriate to block his confirmation.

    Recent Gallup poll here

    Highlights:

    * About the same number of Americans rate Alito's selection either excellent or good (43%) as rate it fair or poor (39%). Miers received a similar rating, but Roberts' rating was somewhat more positive: 51% excellent or good, 34% fair or poor.

    * More people feel positive rather than negative about Alito personally -- 44% to 19%, respectively -- with another third offering no rating. Again, Miers' rating was similar, but a majority, 54%, gave Roberts a favorable personal rating.

    * About half of those interviewed Tuesday night believe Alito's views are mainstream, while a quarter think his views are too extreme, and another quarter have no opinion.

    * It doesn't bother most Americans (75%) that Alito is a man nominated to replace the first woman ever appointed to the Supreme Court. About the same percentage were not bothered when Roberts was first nominated to replace O'Connor (after Chief Justice William Rehnquist died, President Bush nominated Roberts to become chief justice).

    * The public is evenly divided as to whether Alito probably would or would not vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. Thirty-eight percent believe he would, and an equal percentage think he would not, with the rest offering no opinion.

    * If it becomes clear Alito would vote to reverse Roe v. Wade, Americans would not want the Senate to confirm him, by 53% to 37%.

    * If most Senate Democrats oppose the nomination and decide to filibuster against Alito, 50% of Americans believe they would be justified, while 40% say they would not.

    * If the Republicans then decide to eliminate the filibuster on judicial nominations, to ensure an "up-or-down vote" on the nomination, Americans would be evenly divided as to whether that tactic was justified -- 45% say it would be, 47% say it would not.
    I guess this confirms that we'll get to see the "I'm not going to give my views on abortion" dance yet again...
  • cosmo
    Gold Gabber
    • Jun 2004
    • 583

    #2
    Re: Sam Alito -- Mainstream?

    The term 'mainstream' can't even be defined. What is a 'mainstream' judge supposed to do? Again, we're looking for a judge that is experienced in judical law, and applying the law to the case at hand.

    Who cares what his political views are? Who cares if he opposes abortion? Moreover, there is evidence that he voted in favor of abortion in 3 out of the 4 cases related to abortion in his career.

    Does that sound like someone who would be an activist?

    Even more intresting is the fact that his personal writings favor gay rights and privacy.

    His record doesn't show a hint of activism. And that should be good news. Once you read his opinions and dissents, it clearly shows that this is one brilliant guy.

    Comment

    • cosmo
      Gold Gabber
      • Jun 2004
      • 583

      #3
      Re: Sam Alito -- Mainstream?

      Oh and one more thing: The Gang of 14 has been 'fractured'. This shall pave the way for his nomination.

      Comment

      • toasty
        Sir Toastiness
        • Jun 2004
        • 6585

        #4
        Re: Sam Alito -- Mainstream?

        Originally posted by cosmo
        The term 'mainstream' can't even be defined.
        I disagree. A "mainstream" judge is one who's views are in accordance with those folks in the middle of the political spectrum. Not ultra liberal, not ultra conservative. In the middle.

        It does look like he'll likely be confirmed, though. Que sera, sera...

        Comment

        • cosmo
          Gold Gabber
          • Jun 2004
          • 583

          #5
          Re: Sam Alito -- Mainstream?

          Originally posted by toasty
          I disagree. A "mainstream" judge is one who's views are in accordance with those folks in the middle of the political spectrum. Not ultra liberal, not ultra conservative. In the middle.

          It does look like he'll likely be confirmed, though. Que sera, sera...


          Why do they have to be in accordance with the views of the majority? Courts shouldn't be treated in such a manner. A mainstream judge?

          Never heard of it. The democrats made that a priority per their political agenda. It doesn't exist.

          A mainstream judge is an activist judge. There is no other explanation.

          Comment

          Working...