Worst idea ever. Why would we want to give this clown more power?
The absurd thing is that it isn't as if Bush has refrained from passing a law because he was troubled by a particular portion of it -- the guy hasn't vetoed a single bill. All this will do is allow Bush (or any president, for that matter) to unilaterally change any law -- and you can make some pretty radical changes to a law by just striking some provisions, to the point where it may not have the same effect intended by Congress.
Bad idea for any president, IMO, but a really bad idea for Bush, a powermonger and idiot...
For the record, before any of you hop up and down about the fact that Clinton wanted this, too, I was just as strongly against it then, as well.
The absurd thing is that it isn't as if Bush has refrained from passing a law because he was troubled by a particular portion of it -- the guy hasn't vetoed a single bill. All this will do is allow Bush (or any president, for that matter) to unilaterally change any law -- and you can make some pretty radical changes to a law by just striking some provisions, to the point where it may not have the same effect intended by Congress.
Bad idea for any president, IMO, but a really bad idea for Bush, a powermonger and idiot...
For the record, before any of you hop up and down about the fact that Clinton wanted this, too, I was just as strongly against it then, as well.
Comment