listen i know the difference between right and wrong isnt always the legal - illegal comparison, but do all these ppl (beaners) realize that even when they argue against ANY change they use the words illegal imigrants.... and i havent been paying attention but isnt bush going for a better method than kicking them out and criminalizing them. isnt he backing a clemency program and sponsorship? i dont know and im not reading articles so some1 tell me. but when GW2 and teddy kennedy agree on something i instantly ask questions...
imo, this country does need tougher imigration policy, something more like france, germany, or italy, nederlands, etc. where you actually have to learn the history and laws and culture before you just open up an """afghan diner""" or landscaping business.
there has to be a happy medium in here, we cannot simply live with open borders and allow illegals to suck up resources they dont pay for. but we cant become a closed society like australia has within thier policies.
PS along the lines of recent threads. -- fuck em, we need em, just dont let em open a 5 family house on my block.
imo, this country does need tougher imigration policy, something more like france, germany, or italy, nederlands, etc. where you actually have to learn the history and laws and culture before you just open up an """afghan diner""" or landscaping business.
there has to be a happy medium in here, we cannot simply live with open borders and allow illegals to suck up resources they dont pay for. but we cant become a closed society like australia has within thier policies.
PS along the lines of recent threads. -- fuck em, we need em, just dont let em open a 5 family house on my block.
Comment