Re: God does exist
Of course it can be used as factual proof. The question is, "proof of what?"
If I walk into a room and smell perfume, that means that someone wearing perfume was in the room before me, probably in the fairly recent past. It does not mean that a specific person was in the room. It doesn't mean that God saw to it that the room smelled like perfume for my arrival.
I suspect that you intend to present various evidence of God in the world around us -- things that you think couldn't possibly exist without divine intervention, things that science hasn't completely wrapped its collective head around yet. The fact that science hasn't come up with an explanation yet, though, isn't affirmative proof of anything.
Looking back through time, there are limitless examples of things that once confused us but that we now understand. We once tried to cure people of their illnesses by bloodletting, FFS.
At the risk of beating a dead horse, I want to emphasize that this doesn't mean that God doesn't exist -- it just means that you're not going to have any luck proving it empirically. It is a matter of faith, and any argument to the contrary is going to be hopelessly circular. Already, most every point you've advanced presumes the existence of God which, of course, is exactly what you're trying to establish.
Please, just believe in God, be happy, and quit approaching this like it's science.
Of course it can be used as factual proof. The question is, "proof of what?"
If I walk into a room and smell perfume, that means that someone wearing perfume was in the room before me, probably in the fairly recent past. It does not mean that a specific person was in the room. It doesn't mean that God saw to it that the room smelled like perfume for my arrival.
I suspect that you intend to present various evidence of God in the world around us -- things that you think couldn't possibly exist without divine intervention, things that science hasn't completely wrapped its collective head around yet. The fact that science hasn't come up with an explanation yet, though, isn't affirmative proof of anything.
Looking back through time, there are limitless examples of things that once confused us but that we now understand. We once tried to cure people of their illnesses by bloodletting, FFS.
At the risk of beating a dead horse, I want to emphasize that this doesn't mean that God doesn't exist -- it just means that you're not going to have any luck proving it empirically. It is a matter of faith, and any argument to the contrary is going to be hopelessly circular. Already, most every point you've advanced presumes the existence of God which, of course, is exactly what you're trying to establish.
Please, just believe in God, be happy, and quit approaching this like it's science.
Comment