Kerry Phones Vietnam Vets To Apologize

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Balanc3
    Platinum Poster
    • Jun 2004
    • 1278

    Kerry Phones Vietnam Vets To Apologize

    The part toasty left out. At least Kerry was trying to apologize.

    XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX TUE AUG 24, 2004 11:09:31 ET XXXXX

    KERRY PHONES SWIFT BOAT FOES

    **World Exclusive**

    Dem presidential hopeful John Kerry personally phoned anti-Kerry swift boat vets, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

    Kerry reached out to Robert "Friar Tuck" Brant Cdr., USN (RET) Sunday night, just hours after former Sen. Bob Dole publicly challenged Kerry to apologize to veterans.

    Brant was skipper of the #96 and # 36 boat and spent time with Kerry in An Thoi. Kerry and Brant slept in the same quarters, and Brant used to put Kerry back to bed at night when Kerry was sleepwalking.

    Brant received a call from Kerry at his home in Virginia while he was watching the Olympics on TV.

    The call lasted 10 minutes, sources tell DRUDGE.

    KERRY: "Why are all these swift boat guys opposed to me?"

    BRANT: "You should know what you said when you came back, the impact it had on the young sailors and how it was disrespectful of our guys that were killed over there."

    [Brant had two men killed in battle.]

    KERRY: "When we dedicated swift boat one in '92, I said to all the swift guys that I wasn't talking about the swifties, I was talking about all the rest of the veterans."

    Kerry then asked if he could meet Brant ["You were one of the best"] -- man to man -- face to face.

    Brant declined the invite, explaining that Kerry was obviously not prepared to correct the record on exactly what happened during Vietnam and what happened when Kerry came back.

    eat it up.
    JourneyDeep .into the sound
  • toasty
    Sir Toastiness
    • Jun 2004
    • 6585

    #2
    That's interesting, if it's true. I can't find any reference to it in any other source, though. The thing with the Drudge Report, I've noticed, is that it tends to run pretty much everything it gets, carte blanche. This is both good and bad. Good, for the obvious reason that you get an avalanche of information, but bad in that sometimes the veracity of its "exclusive" stories are suspect. Among the conservative web sites, though, I actually think it does a pretty good job of presenting things objectively.

    It'll be interesting to see how this plays out, if any other reference to it pops up anywhere else, etc.

    Comment

    • sheryar
      Getting Somewhere
      • Jul 2004
      • 167

      #3
      interesting. .

      but tapping phone calls and listening in is against the law so .
      sheryar

      - - - - - - - - - -
      http://www.sheryarhyatt.com

      Comment

      • Balanc3
        Platinum Poster
        • Jun 2004
        • 1278

        #4
        its a transcript bunghole.
        JourneyDeep .into the sound

        Comment

        Working...