FAO Americans (or Jenks?) [aka the Adam's-Big-Deck Thread]

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • picklemonkey
    Double hoodie beer monster
    • Jun 2004
    • 15373

    FAO Americans (or Jenks?) [aka the Adam's-Big-Deck Thread]

    why are Imperial lumber sizes not what they say? example, a 2x4 isn't 2"x4". etc.
  • asdf_admin
    i use to be important
    • Jun 2004
    • 12798

    #2
    Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

    because that is how the wood is cut.
    dead, yet alive.

    Comment

    • MusicJatt
      Platinum Poster
      • Aug 2004
      • 1371

      #3
      Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

      i believe two is usually 1.5

      Comment

      • Jenks
        I'm kind of a big deal.
        • Jun 2004
        • 10250

        #4
        Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

        a 2" x 4" is 1.5" x 3.5".

        In the US, lumber is measured before planing. Back in the day, lumber wasn't sent to the mill and planed. If you cut a 2x4 ...it was a 2x4. Since today we actually like lumber that's closer to perfect and straight, we plane it. For whatever reason, i assume for the old timers, we just call it what it originally was. It's just kinda one of those "this is the way it's always been done" things. Blame your grandpa.

        Comment

        • picklemonkey
          Double hoodie beer monster
          • Jun 2004
          • 15373

          #5
          Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

          thanks

          I'm thinking about building 12 stairs onto my back deck into my back yard, and have been sketching some stuff up in a 3d modeler program. realized that 2x4s were 1.5x3.5s and suddenly realized I had to start over

          Comment

          • Global Eyes
            Gold Gabber
            • Jun 2004
            • 715

            #6
            Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

            Carry's right through all lumber measurements. It's originally cut as a 2X4 off the log, then dried and ripped down for straightness. So your paying for that process, so it's in your face to let you know, pretty much.

            Comment

            • jeffrey collins
              Not cool enough
              • Jun 2004
              • 7427

              #7
              Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

              i don't believe that at all. I know it's nothing but greed, and that is the reason our lumber is smaller than said.
              Jeffrey Collins: Painter
              My Painting Blog

              http://soundcloud.com/jeffreycollins
              My Soundcloud page.

              Comment

              • jarble187
                vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
                • Sep 2004
                • 2047

                #8
                Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

                Originally posted by picklemonkey
                thanks

                I'm thinking about building 12 stairs onto my back deck into my back yard, and have been sketching some stuff up in a 3d modeler program. realized that 2x4s were 1.5x3.5s and suddenly realized I had to start over
                You should hire an architect...geez.

                Jenks is on the right track-
                Yep, deminsional lumber (finished) vs. nominal lumber (rough).

                It has nothing to do with greed. Taken from Wiki (come on Pickle)-

                The nominal size of a board varies from the actual size of the board. This is due to planing and shrinkage as the board is dried. This results in the final lumber being slightly smaller than the nominal size. Also, if the wood is surfaced when it is green, the initial dimensions are slightly larger (e.g. 1/16″ bigger for up to 4″ nominal lumber, ⅛″ for 5″ and 6″ nominal lumber, ?″ bigger for larger sizes). As the wood dries, it shrinks and reaches the specified actual dimensions.

                The timber industry states that finishing and drying the lumber results in the nominal size differing from the actual size, however, you will find that many houses built more than roughly 50 years ago usually have timber where the actual size and nominal size are the same. This has allowed new construction to become less expensive without having to modify municipal, state, and national building codes.

                Good luck with that modeling program you do it yourselfer- Let me know if you need any help.
                Push the envelope, watch it bend.


                www.kansascitytechno.com


                Wakarusa Dj Winter Classic Mix Submission Feb 2011

                Comment

                • Jenks
                  I'm kind of a big deal.
                  • Jun 2004
                  • 10250

                  #9
                  Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

                  Originally posted by jarble187
                  You should hire an architect...geez.
                  you don't need an architect to build a deck. lol.

                  Comment

                  • Miguel
                    Are you Kidding me??
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 3182

                    #10
                    Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

                    is the same with marble tiles .. they're not 24x24 .. they're usually half an inch shorter

                    Comment

                    • jarble187
                      vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
                      • Sep 2004
                      • 2047

                      #11
                      Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

                      Originally posted by Jenks
                      you don't need an architect to build a deck. lol.
                      I am an architect, just giving him some grief

                      An no, you dont need to hire an architect to build a deck, but it might be a good idea if you plan on DIY and you dont even know the difference between nominal and dimensional lumber. Background and experience is a good thing to have when it comes to construction.
                      Push the envelope, watch it bend.


                      www.kansascitytechno.com


                      Wakarusa Dj Winter Classic Mix Submission Feb 2011

                      Comment

                      • picklemonkey
                        Double hoodie beer monster
                        • Jun 2004
                        • 15373

                        #12
                        Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

                        good thing I know the difference

                        Comment

                        • jarble187
                          vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
                          • Sep 2004
                          • 2047

                          #13
                          Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

                          ^^^^^consider yourself educated!
                          Push the envelope, watch it bend.


                          www.kansascitytechno.com


                          Wakarusa Dj Winter Classic Mix Submission Feb 2011

                          Comment

                          • picklemonkey
                            Double hoodie beer monster
                            • Jun 2004
                            • 15373

                            #14
                            Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

                            now I just need to learn to use a hammer and i'll be ready to start building

                            Comment

                            • KinKyJ
                              Platinum Poser
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 13438

                              #15
                              Re: FAO Americans (or Jenks?)

                              ^^^ http://www.ehow.com/how_12133_hammer-safely.html

                              Comment

                              Working...