why wont the BBC call thier reporter in gaza a hostage who was kidnapped.
they keep calling him a missing man, even while ackowledging the gov't is negotiating with groups who hold him (hamas?)
so with BBC usually taking a slightly liberal stance (but still being the most independent station around), why wont they just report it as for what it is. a group, deemed terrorist by the EU and others, kidnapped a man, and are holding him. he isnt missing.
are they holding the correct description away from the headlines simply to be a little too PC?
they keep calling him a missing man, even while ackowledging the gov't is negotiating with groups who hold him (hamas?)
so with BBC usually taking a slightly liberal stance (but still being the most independent station around), why wont they just report it as for what it is. a group, deemed terrorist by the EU and others, kidnapped a man, and are holding him. he isnt missing.
are they holding the correct description away from the headlines simply to be a little too PC?
Comment