$67 million pants

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • toasty
    Sir Toastiness
    • Jun 2004
    • 6585

    $67 million pants

    A judge in DC has spun a dispute over a pair of pants that went missing from his dry cleaner into a protracted legal battle claiming a staggering $67 million in damages. He actually turned down a $12,000 offer of settlement for this single pair of pants:

    Plaintiff Roy Pearson, a judge in Washington, D.C., says in court papers that he's been through the ringer over a lost pair of prized pants he wanted to wear on his first day on the bench.

    He says in court papers that he has endured "mental suffering, inconvenience and discomfort."
    As a trial attorney that normally represents plaintiffs, let me be the first to chastise this clown for wasting the time, effort and money of everyone involved in this absurd suit.
  • Kamal
    Administrator
    • May 2002
    • 28835

    #2
    Re: $67 million pants

    sue him toasty
    www.mjwebhosting.com

    Jib says:
    he isnt worth the water that splashes up into your asshole while you're shitting
    Originally posted by ace_dl
    Guys and Gals, I have to hurry/leaving for short-term vacations.
    I won't be back until next Tuesday, so if Get Carter is the correct answer, I would appreciate of someone else posts a new cap for me

    Comment

    • Huggie Smiles
      Anyone have Styx livesets?
      • Jun 2004
      • 11835

      #3
      Re: $67 million pants

      how can you possibly claim 67 million? -

      the emotioanl hardship of loosing one pair of trousers?
      did he fall and become quadraplegic on the way in to pick them up?
      did he have to wear a skirt in public cos he had no trousers causing significant emotional distress?
      ....Freak in the morning, Freak in the evening, aint no other Freak like me thats breathing....




      Comment

      • res0nat0r
        Someone MARRY ME!! LOL
        • May 2006
        • 14475

        #4
        Re: $67 million pants

        wow, what a good way to have your boss notice you are a total dipshit and hopefully fire you.

        no wonder why everyone is a jackass in this country and wants to sue to get some free money, even judges are doing it.

        Comment

        • toasty
          Sir Toastiness
          • Jun 2004
          • 6585

          #5
          Re: $67 million pants

          Seriously, I ought to sue him on behalf of the entire bar for defamation for the heaping ration of shit we're all going to have to endure for the benefit of his massive ego. You know, it would be a funny story if it were just some pro se litigant filing on their own behalf. It would be embarrassing if a lawyer had taken the case and was litigating it in this fashion, and obnoxious if a lawyer was litigating this on his own behalf. For it to be a judge who is pressing this case in this manner, though, I think most of us in the plaintiff's bar want the opportunity to publicly flog him for casting our profession in such a horrible, greedy light.

          We get enough bad press just waking up in the morning and I try to do what I can to rebut that notion. This doesn't help.

          Comment

          • res0nat0r
            Someone MARRY ME!! LOL
            • May 2006
            • 14475

            #6
            Re: $67 million pants

            hopefully o'reilly will get ahold of this story and embrass the shit outta this guy, he will then resign or be fired.

            Comment

            • toasty
              Sir Toastiness
              • Jun 2004
              • 6585

              #7
              Re: $67 million pants

              Originally posted by res0nat0r
              hopefully o'reilly will get ahold of this story and embrass the shit outta this guy, he will then resign or be fired.
              Actually, it would be much better if someone that is actually respected by the populace at large and doesn't already hate trial attorneys were to get a hold of it. I'd rather see the bar do some self-policing and ostracize this guy to send the message that we're just as outraged at using the legal system for such ridiculous, selfish, and wasteful conquests.

              Comment

              • jeffrey collins
                Not cool enough
                • Jun 2004
                • 7427

                #8
                Re: $67 million pants

                i saw this on Nightline last night. The idiot wants 1 Million for pain and suffering alone. What an asshole.

                That guy should have his liscense to practice law revoked.
                Jeffrey Collins: Painter
                My Painting Blog

                http://soundcloud.com/jeffreycollins
                My Soundcloud page.

                Comment

                • KinKyJ
                  Platinum Poser
                  • Jun 2004
                  • 13438

                  #9
                  Re: $67 million pants

                  ^^^ could be a great business plan for 75 clothing, no?

                  Comment

                  • speciale
                    Are you Kidding me??
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 3728

                    #10
                    Re: $67 million pants

                    nice pants
                    Originally posted by Miroslav
                    It's not like he grabbed his balls and sucked his dick. It's not like he gave the Saudis the original copy of the Constitution to use as toilet paper. It's not like he gave away the secret recipe to the Colonel's chicken. .
                    No Soup for You

                    Comment

                    • res0nat0r
                      Someone MARRY ME!! LOL
                      • May 2006
                      • 14475

                      #11
                      Re: $67 million pants

                      Comment

                      • threehills
                        I heart Lollergirl
                        • Jun 2005
                        • 3641

                        #12
                        Re: $67 million pants

                        Somebody tell that judge those are Rhinestone and not diamonds.

                        It's never too late to become the person you always thought you would be.

                        Comment

                        • simonr
                          Transitionator
                          • Jun 2004
                          • 8796

                          #13
                          Re: $67 million pants

                          I see that you can buy Jeans by a Co. called "Money" that have a $100 bill sewn in to them !
                          sigpicSimonR

                          This release was mastered direct from vinyl at the request of the DJ and as such features natural sound characteristics of this medium such as record surface noise.

                          Comment

                          • Taylor Norris
                            Platinum Poster
                            • Oct 2005
                            • 1375

                            #14
                            Re: $67 million pants

                            Greed is winning.
                            Ignorance isn't to far behind.

                            Comment

                            • BureOne
                              Are you Kidding me??
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 3285

                              #15
                              Re: $67 million pants

                              hahaha he wanted to wear these on his first day on the bench wtf! First of all that "gown' covers most of the pants and second of all he's behind a hunge podium, where all you see is his upper torso! This country is going straight to hell!

                              Comment

                              Working...