Looks like 2 of the GOP front runners -- Guiliani and Romney -- are taking a pass on the YouTube debate in September, which actually puts the event itself in jeopardy.
Their inability to make it is attributed to scheduling issues, but what else could possible be going on that would trump a national debate? Your supporters will understand if you have to reschedule an appearance somewhere to attend a debate.
That leaves a few options, IMO:
1. They are afraid of the format. This seems a bit silly, because it really isn't that different from a traditional town hall style debate. The questioners were a bit more relaxed, and the questions were probably a bit less predictable, but on balance, I would like my president to be able to handle that sort of environment. Yes, answering questions from snowmen is a little ridiculous, but there were lots of solid, heartfelt questions -- like the lesbian couple that wanted to know why they couldn't get married -- that more than made up for some of the more comical entries. Going back to a traditional town hall style debate, in which questioners read overly-rehearsed questions off of note cards, would be a step back, IMO.
2. They don't think the YouTube generation is a voting block worth courting.
3. I guess another option might be that this is payback for Dems backing out of the Fox News/CBC debate.
Thoughts?
Their inability to make it is attributed to scheduling issues, but what else could possible be going on that would trump a national debate? Your supporters will understand if you have to reschedule an appearance somewhere to attend a debate.
That leaves a few options, IMO:
1. They are afraid of the format. This seems a bit silly, because it really isn't that different from a traditional town hall style debate. The questioners were a bit more relaxed, and the questions were probably a bit less predictable, but on balance, I would like my president to be able to handle that sort of environment. Yes, answering questions from snowmen is a little ridiculous, but there were lots of solid, heartfelt questions -- like the lesbian couple that wanted to know why they couldn't get married -- that more than made up for some of the more comical entries. Going back to a traditional town hall style debate, in which questioners read overly-rehearsed questions off of note cards, would be a step back, IMO.
2. They don't think the YouTube generation is a voting block worth courting.
3. I guess another option might be that this is payback for Dems backing out of the Fox News/CBC debate.
Thoughts?
Comment