The more I think about it, the more I see that Palin was a risky but shrewd bet - and one that seems to be paying off. Like most people, I misjudged her at first by just focusing on her lack of experience and contrasting her with Hillary's historic run...when in fact the reality is this:
It's not about whether she is really good or not (perhaps she may be). Her value lies in the fact that she is such an effective foil to Obama's image.
Got trouble dealing with Obama, the populist outsider/reformer/change-bringer? Then fight fire with fire and get your own. She's proven that she is charismatic and good enough to capture the spotlight and favorably place herself in peoples' minds as a reformer and a Washington outsider. And it seems she has credibly stripped some of the sheen off of the Obama campaign as "owning" all the buzz about reform, change, outsider status, populist rhetoric, etc. - all the stuff that emotionally fired people up about Obama.
And here's the really smart part: Even when you try to nail her for her weaknesses, they quickly point you back to Obama. Palin's inexperienced? Maybe she won't be as effective? OK, sure. But...then what can you say about Obama, who is even just heading for VP but for the top seat? If you say that she's empty and lacks substance...it's hard not to then apply that same standard to Obama.
The gamble was whether Palin would go over well with the broader public. She did. And it was only effective because it was Obama on the other side...who they watched go first and pick a 30+ year Washington insider as VP.
The Obama campaign should pay attention and take her seriously now as a threat. They're getting a taste of their own medicine.
It's not about whether she is really good or not (perhaps she may be). Her value lies in the fact that she is such an effective foil to Obama's image.
Got trouble dealing with Obama, the populist outsider/reformer/change-bringer? Then fight fire with fire and get your own. She's proven that she is charismatic and good enough to capture the spotlight and favorably place herself in peoples' minds as a reformer and a Washington outsider. And it seems she has credibly stripped some of the sheen off of the Obama campaign as "owning" all the buzz about reform, change, outsider status, populist rhetoric, etc. - all the stuff that emotionally fired people up about Obama.
And here's the really smart part: Even when you try to nail her for her weaknesses, they quickly point you back to Obama. Palin's inexperienced? Maybe she won't be as effective? OK, sure. But...then what can you say about Obama, who is even just heading for VP but for the top seat? If you say that she's empty and lacks substance...it's hard not to then apply that same standard to Obama.
The gamble was whether Palin would go over well with the broader public. She did. And it was only effective because it was Obama on the other side...who they watched go first and pick a 30+ year Washington insider as VP.
The Obama campaign should pay attention and take her seriously now as a threat. They're getting a taste of their own medicine.
Comment