If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
enter the bad guy (insert cheesy music) tam tam tam
This shit just insults the intelligence of anyone who knows anything about politics...it offers nothing new to the debate. Globalization with a new twist. Don't get me wrong I agree with most of the shit said, I just don't find it very shocking...the democrats and republicans cooperate woopty fucking doo... its called a government. The military industrial complex...etc its all something I studied as facts in politics. Elitism etc its nothing new and nothing shocking at all...all those things do not prove the conclusions made in these films.
The thing about Obama being a puppet...its true in a way thats what I mean when i say its naive to think that a career politician has a conscience...what chance has an average guy who has no connections becoming a president, candidates are selected by elites...its a fact but its still not very shocking to me...I don't know might have just gone numb. Maybe I should be shocked?
TheIdiotsAREWinning.
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect."
Mark Twain
just because I post something doesn't mean \i back it 100%. \i post things that I believe they are worth talking about. It just came out today and I thought you guys would be grateful for me bringing it to MS attention.
Watched the first one (second one appears to be dead)...meh. Several points to the video:
1. Politicians basically mediate and serve the interests of their constituents. They have to not let things get too out of balance in favor of one group of constituents like they recently did, but it's a simple fact of life that financiers and heads of big corporations will always have a disproportionate sway. Why? Because they're the ones who fund stuff and make stuff that basically enables our modern way of life. They control the means of production which keep us from being in the freaking stone age, and so they will always have more influence. duh. Is it fair? Not necessarily. But that's life.
2. This whole "New World Order" = America and Britain dominating the rest of the world...that's only been going on for the past 100 years already (HELLO mr. historian ). If anything, I would argue that America and Britain are now undergoing a decline of wealth/power and that their influence around the world is going to decline as well. I doubt this "New World Order" is going to be so Anglo-American; if anything, it might tend to be more Chinese.
Last edited by Miroslav; March 12, 2009, 09:31:00 PM.
the moral of the story is that the banks have taken over your country. Lincoln warned of this a long time ago and now it is happening..not a big deal as long as you have tough hands.. and back..
^^Its not "happening" it already happened.
As for Miro's point about Chinese controlling the NWO its not gonna happen...the west controls all the important patents and that ultimately what counts...all the corporations that have a global impact i.e. Nike, Coca Cola etc they are the ones sewing the seeds of the NWO.
Again just to stress the point that when I say NWO I mean the official verssion i.e. global interconectedness and intergovermental coperation.
TheIdiotsAREWinning.
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect."
Mark Twain
the moral of the story is that the banks have taken over your country.
By the way, they've "taken over" your country, too.
Originally posted by Shpira
^^Its not "happening" it already happened.
^^ this.
Since the beginning of civilization, it's always been the case that whoever controls the scarce resources/money bags and means of production wields disproportionate power. This is nothing new, and Karl Marx already galvanized a political movement in opposition to this.
If you voted for Obama expecting him to reverse this entire wealth-power paradigm, then yes, you should feel deceived (and you should also have your head checked). If you voted for Obama expecting him to take some steps toward stabilizing this economic mess, making positive changes in healthcare, improving infrastructure, and improving US foreign relations...then the jury is still out as to whether or not you will be deceived. You'll get a sense for that in about a year; these aren't problems you solve in 90 days.
"Son," he said without preamble, "never trust a man who doesn't drink because he's probably a self-righteous sort, a man who thinks he knows right from wrong all the time. Some of them are good men, but in the name of goodness, they cause most of the suffering in the world. They're the judges, the meddlers. And, son, never trust a man who drinks but refuses to get drunk. They're usually afraid of something deep down inside, either that they're a coward or a fool or mean and violent. You can't trust a man who's afraid of himself. But sometimes, son, you can trust a man who occasionally kneels before a toilet. The chances are that he is learning something about humility and his natural human foolishness, about how to survive himself. It's damned hard for a man to take himself too seriously when he's heaving his guts into a dirty toilet bowl."
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment