Re: Town Halls Turn into Town Mess
Yes, I fully admit that my comment about the AARP was not correct: AARP says it supports health care reform per se, but they have not yet fully endorsed a specific plan.
But guess what? I was still half right; their spokesman did speak out and say that the "death panels" are a pile of bullshit:
And guess what else? The AARP supports this advance care planning portion that people are misconstruing as "death panels":
And guess what else? None of this crap with the AARP still changes the fact that the claims by the right-wingers about death panels (!!!) and such are completely wrong. There is a difference in erring on what the AARP claims as to their endorsement vs. erring on the basics of what is in the proposal. Comprende?
So basically, aside from that specific comment about the AARP's full endorsement, which is like 1% of my post, the entire remaining 99% of my post makes complete sense and is relevant.
And by the way, let me say it again - I don't even support the plan as it presently stands, which you could have found out if you had actually read some of my previous posts in this thread. But I try to form my opposition for rational reasons based on what's in the plan and not irrational partisan "socialism" fearmongering.
So chew on that.
Yes, I fully admit that my comment about the AARP was not correct: AARP says it supports health care reform per se, but they have not yet fully endorsed a specific plan.
But guess what? I was still half right; their spokesman did speak out and say that the "death panels" are a pile of bullshit:
"We've been hearing concerns from our members that this is a step toward government-mandated euthanasia," says Jim Dau, a spokesman for the AARP, the advocacy group for people past age 50, which supports health-care reform to help older Americans. "These are baseless scare tactics put out by those who seek to derail health-care reform. The bill would help people find resources to help themselves and their doctors make important decisions about the end of their lives."
The AARP's Dau feels that, despite the controversy, the advance care planning portion of the bill will survive and become law. "This is such a commonsense, win-win piece," he says. "I'm sure it's considered good sense by lawmakers of both political parties, and medical associations and nursing groups."
And guess what else? None of this crap with the AARP still changes the fact that the claims by the right-wingers about death panels (!!!) and such are completely wrong. There is a difference in erring on what the AARP claims as to their endorsement vs. erring on the basics of what is in the proposal. Comprende?
So basically, aside from that specific comment about the AARP's full endorsement, which is like 1% of my post, the entire remaining 99% of my post makes complete sense and is relevant.
And by the way, let me say it again - I don't even support the plan as it presently stands, which you could have found out if you had actually read some of my previous posts in this thread. But I try to form my opposition for rational reasons based on what's in the plan and not irrational partisan "socialism" fearmongering.
So chew on that.
Comment