If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I don?t know in which country you live, but over here
somebody is not guilty till he is convicted.
I for myself know how prude lots of the people in the US are.
You can?t even show a tit on TV without a scandal.
In such circumstances somebody might be watched too carefully,
don?t you think...?
I don?t know in which country you live, but over here
somebody is not guilty till he is convicted.
I for myself know how prude lots of the people in the US are.
You can?t even show a tit on TV without a scandal.
In such circumstances somebody might be watched too carefully,
don?t you think...?
Just my 2cents.
DUDE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you do realize he admitted, on TV and in court, to having touched and slept with children. just because there wasnt any penetration doesnt mean its right.
your life is an occasion, rise to it.
Join My Chant. new mix. april 09. dirty fuck house.
download that. deep shit listed there
^ i totally beleive he is guilty too...the sad thing is he can plead "insane" and he will probably walk.......there is not a person on this earth (imo) that can argue that he is sane! his whole life story is summed up in one word "freakshow"
i'm not a real dork i just play one on the internet.......
you do realize he admitted, on TV and in court, to having touched and slept with children. just because there wasnt any penetration doesnt mean its right.
I don?t like Jacko as well. But to lie with children in a bed, sleep
together with them (like a Father/Brother) is not against the law.
What if it was Janet Jackson?
Do you mean it would be the same hype if a woman sleeps
with Children in the same bed???
Let him alone, I?d say. And again, he is not guilty till he
is convicted.
so, you know all 294,919,506 of us?
No offense. I?ve never been in the US.
But what I see on TV is very strange...
you do realize he admitted, on TV and in court, to having touched and slept with children. just because there wasnt any penetration doesnt mean its right.
I don?t like Jacko as well. But to lie with children in a bed, sleep
together with them (like a Father/Brother) is not against the law.
What if it was Janet Jackson?
Do you mean it would be the same hype if a woman sleeps
with Children in the same bed???
Let him alone, I?d say. And again, he is not guilty till he
is convicted.
so, you know all 294,919,506 of us?
No offense. I?ve never been in the US.
But what I see on TV is very strange...
thats a great way to generalize about americans...just cause we have a leader who does fucked up shit, doesnt mean we all like that :wink:
thats a great way to generalize about americans...just cause we have a leader who does fucked up shit, doesnt mean we all like that
I for myself know how prude lots of the people in the US are
Could be you misunderstood? I didn?t mean that all of you are
prude, that?s why I wrote "LOTS". I know some guys over there and know that THEY aren?t.
But it is the damn gouvernment over there, togeher with some
media-hype that builds the common opinion.
I show you some samples of biased persons:
god, pedophilia is a fucking shame. how is this clown still free? someone put this idiot in jail
^ i totally beleive he is guilty too...
I feel a little sorry for him, but lock him up anyway
Shouldn?t this be judged by a court?
Just because he looks like an ape and loves children (like millions others do)
he mustn?t be locked away,
must he?
If he did really penetrate them, well....lock him away...
I agree Jack-o is weird, who can deny that. BUT...
like my colleague Chatterbot eluded to, sleeping with a child in bed is not a crime, in a father/son/brother scenario. You remember when you were a child and ran into your mum and dads room after a night mare. Maybe he doesnt see it any different. Which, yes, it doesnt seem right, but is it a crime?
For some reason, I honestly don't think he sees anything wrong with it. And if he WAS doing anything besides just sharing a bed with these kids, then I really dont think he would even be stupid enough to admit it.
I mean, you cant argue he is an easy target.. disgustingly rich, compulsive weirdo.. he is a product of what society made him, which is larger than life, without much of a sense of reality, but maybe thats just ignorance, or the epitome of innocence. But that doesnt make him automatically guilty.
You cant deny people go after money when they see an opportunity.
Kid comes home, "mummy, I had a slumber party with Michael Jackson"
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ in mum and dads eyes
look at the episode with Kobe... that slut is going to get millions most likely, and she dropped rape charges and went right for a civil suit.
instead of trying to rail road him for allegedly doing something, how about trying to find out what really happened to Jon Benet, or the Aisenberg baby or other numerous unsolved crimes that actually DID happen.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment