If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The investigation into the Bloody Sunday massacre of 1972 where British troops executed 14 civilians after being shot at earlier in the day. I official investigation concluded last week. It took 12 years and cost £192 million pounds (Yes Pounds not dollars), considerably more than the 9/11 commission had for their investigation.
Anyone else notice that Oil Rig burned for 36 hours with a constant fuel source and flame that could be seen 90 miles away before falling into the sea.
Apr 24th, 2010 | By Keelan Balderson | Category: News Archive, September 11th - 9/11 Truth
In a hit piece that has turned around and bit them on the ass, Fox News has admitted what the alternative research community have been saying for years, that Building 7, the third building to collapse on the horrific 9/11 attacks, was planned to be demolished by Larry Silverstein.
As written by Jeffrey Scott Shapiro on FoxNews.com
Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.
A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy.’
NIST’s report was that the building came down due to internal fires – however they presumably did not have this information before conducting the investigation, adding to the damning evidence that we were not told the truth about what happened that day.
----------------------------------
As reported on InfoWars:
Immediately after the “pull it” controversy, debunkers claimed there was no plan to conduct a controlled demolition of the building. Now the fact that officials were considering blowing up the building is established, Silverstein’s consistent denial that this took place is a huge smoking gun. How did Silverstein expect to demolish the building safely when such a process takes weeks or even months to properly set up, even without the additional chaos surrounding WTC 7 on 9/11? How could explosives have been correctly placed on such short notice inside a burning building that had already been evacuated – unless the explosives were already in place? This new revelation is astounding and it needs to be investigated immediately.
Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.
A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy.’
So what now you are trying to tell us is although there was a major incident going on 1 block down. Silverstein got on the phone to his insurance company to see if he could conduct a controlled demolition that day. After agreeing this Larry then hooked up with a controlled demolition company that where located in Manhattan and they agreed to come down and demolish building 7 that day, plant some explosives in the building and demolished it that day
So when Silverstein said pull it you’re now saying he actually meant controlled demolition. Is pulling still a term used in controlled demolition when they pull a building with ropes?
3000 people dying next door and your on to the insurance company about an evacuated building incase it collapses on another evacuated building. If my house was on fire I would be straight onto the insurance company to make sure my empty shed was covered.
This revelation really deserves a thread of its own.
3000 people dying next door and your on to the insurance company about an evacuated building incase it collapses on another evacuated building. If my house was on fire I would be straight onto the insurance company to make sure my empty shed was covered.
This revelation really deserves a thread of its own.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
.gif)
Comment