Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

[res0nat0r]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

correct. the govt does assassinate people. extort. abuse. kill. overthrow foreign powers, all of this is totally true. but it doesnt bomb a building with 50k people watching from the ground in person, and with 50 eyewiteness videos and professional news coverage during the middle of the day. nor does it take paper mache airplanes and make them look like 747s and fly them into large buildings to cover up a bombing. this is reality, not the x-files / conspiricy theory / the conversation / marathon man / chinatown / the manchurian candidate / they live / soylent green / enemy of the state / three days of the condor. this is called reality.

[Miroslav]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

i read it and still dont understand a couple of things, lets go over them shall we?

maybe you can help out an ignorant fellow.

nist tests on the steel recovered from the wtc towers show temps did not reach above 600o for more then a couple of mins, but in the models they used to show how the collapse happened, they used temps of 700o and above.



1. how much debris ended up outside the towers footprint?



notice the piece^^right above falling outside? it weighs tons. notice the volume of debris OUTSIDE the footprint?

the problem with the governments report and why we need a new investigation is this....

they want us to believe that the upper blocks fell onto the lower blocks, picking up their mass as the collapse goes along.

but we can see from pics during and after the collapse, that most mass was pulverized in midair, ejected out the side(pic above, plus i got tons more) and could not add mass to upper block.

so they want us to believe that(from all estimates)30-40% of the original mass collapsed the lower, undamaged, better built lower block.

but it gets worse, cause they also want to believe the falling mass did this while it was broke up. for those who dont know, a ton of falling material with a single point of contact will exert more force then 50 objects with a combined weight of a ton.

perfect example is this.

one guy has a 100 pound rock droped on his head, the other guy has 100 pounds of pea gravel droped on his head.

which one lives?


they also have not explained how 30% of the mass encountered little to no resistence from the lower block.

how all supports failed at the exact same time(on all 3 buildings) to ensure Symmetric collapse.


also, they have never given out the weight of the top floors, nor have they shared any of their model data so it can be tested by independent sources to verify.

something pretty much unheard of in the world of science.

a theory should be open to be tested by anyone, dont you agree?


btw wanted to let you also know it's against the law of conservation of energy when you state that the upper block disintergrated the lower block, pulverizing the concrete in mid-air and also shooting steel beams weighing tons up to 600 feet to the side.

we can see from pictures, concrete was being pulverized from the onset of collapse



notice the lower lighter colored concrete dust cloud in this photo.

also notice the tipping to the side, the only force acting on the supports in the damaged area is tension from being pulled to the side from the upper block tipping.

logic states that if the tipping is putting force on the supports, when they do give out, it would cause the upper block to tip over the side, not collapse str8 down.

something about a object in motion tends to stay in motion unless acted upon by outside forces?

ah, it must be nothing right?

I don't claim to have every answer on 9-11, but I'll post my thoughts on this soon. However, I will do it in the other 9-11 thread. It's been a very busy few weeks.

[yesme]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

unfortunately since this is an internet message board where people are anonymous and are free to act and troll w/o fear of repercussion this is not surprising.

george d. metz
11-29-73
ft wayne indiana

now that is taken care of, you ready to debate?

if you actually believe this, and chose not to believe not one of the 50 million people watching live tv that day, nor one of the thousands on the ground on nyc during the broad daylight when this was going on; being caused by planes flying into buildings, then there isn't much more to say as you are out of touch with reality and there is no sense talking anymore about the subject.

i find it funny, you want evidence from people who believe it's a conspiracy, but dont ask for evidence from the people who did the investigation.

for example, the government tells us, the buildings were infernos(otherwise the steel supports would not of given out)

sure, that seems logical to me, so i ask, ok where is the evidence to back this up?

government: um, uh, well, um, we dont have any.

me: oh well, then let me take your word for it guys, i know you got nothing but my best interests at heart, i mean look how well you have run the country to date.

correct. the govt does assassinate people. extort. abuse. kill. overthrow foreign powers

but only in mine or your best interest though right?

they use psyops, but on everybody else, correct?

but it doesnt bomb a building with 50k people watching from the ground in person, and with 50 eyewiteness videos and professional news coverage during the middle of the day. nor does it take paper mache airplanes and make them look like 747s and fly them into large buildings to cover up a bombing. this is reality, not the x-files / conspiricy theory / the conversation / marathon man / chinatown / the manchurian candidate / they live / soylent green / enemy of the state / three days of the condor. this is called reality.

sure it does, i would investigate the 93 wtc bombing and the okc bombing if you think otherwise.

the places to start would be the lead government witness in the 93 wtc bombing, and read the "okc bombing and the politics of terror" for info on the okc bombing(which mind you brings out the fact that our own government tells us, that our own government is lieing)

[Huggie Smiles]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

george d. metz
11-29-73
ft wayne indiana

now that is taken care of, you ready to debate?

we just need your social security number then we can talk - a private message will work just fine

[yesme]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

we just need your social security number then we can talk - a private message will work just fine

lol

i hate to say it, but anyone who steals my id, will be doing me a favor

[runningman]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

nobody will debate Charlie Sheen on live TV. Larry King was trying to setup a debate of Charlie vs. whoever and Larry King couldn't find anybody to debate him. Mainstream media is affraid of him considering 60% of the 9/11 Commission even admit it was a scam.

[Miroslav]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

nobody will debate Charlie Sheen on live TV. Larry King was trying to setup a debate of Charlie vs. whoever and Larry King couldn't find anybody to debate him. Mainstream media is affraid of him considering 60% of the 9/11 Commission even admit it was a scam.

Afraid of being associated with him, perhaps. They have their reputations to consider.

[Cj Tari]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

have you also considered the idea that maybe nobody takes Charly Sheen seriously?

i mean, dude's not exactly the brightest of the stars, so i highly doubt anyone with credibility would even consider sitting down with someone who you would consider a "joke".

also, not sure about the "mainstream media being scared" analogy, i mean, what are they supposedly scared of?? of having a very juicy story that they could milk to the ground? i doubt it.

[floridaorange]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

have you also considered the idea that maybe nobody takes Charly Sheen seriously?

i know i don't

[chunky]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

have you also considered the idea that maybe nobody takes Charly Sheen seriously?

i mean, dude's not exactly the brightest of the stars, so i highly doubt anyone with credibility would even consider sitting down with someone who you would consider a "joke".

also, not sure about the "mainstream media being scared" analogy, i mean, what are they supposedly scared of?? of having a very juicy story that they could milk to the ground? i doubt it.

George W Bush wasn't the brightest of stars either and some you guys elected him. What you do by not challenging them is tolerating them. People are willing to go on TV and challenge Neo Nazi's, the KKK and other radical groups but not Charlie Sheen.

When Steven Jones appeared on mainstream American media they wouldnt even show the collapse of building 7.

[runningman]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

when he says he represents the famillies of 9/11 I think you all should have more respect for those families. You should take him seriously.

Everybody has done stupid things in their past especially many of YOUR representatives in congress and senate.

[Miroslav]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

^^ I don't take him seriously and I don't see why he credibly represents anything. Especially when I catch him spewing out some of the same tired arguments that have already been discredited years ago. But I don't take many of our elected officials seriously, either.

[res0nat0r]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

Afraid of being associated with him, perhaps. They have their reputations to consider.

Exactly. Lets debate a coke using prostitute banging tv star, I am a US representative of course, this would be a smart use of my time.

George W Bush wasn't the brightest of stars either and some you guys elected him. What you do by not challenging them is tolerating them. People are willing to go on TV and challenge Neo Nazi's, the KKK and other radical groups but not Charlie Sheen.

When Steven Jones appeared on mainstream American media they wouldnt even show the collapse of building 7.

Actually the MAJORITY of the US people elected him, not some. This is why he was allowed to be put in office. I think this is how this works.

Are really people this out of touch with reality? No one is going to waste time on some dumbshit actors pet theory he made up between eating at the kraft food cart between takes of his sitcom. If actual important figures allow time for this type of nonsense to be dealt with then more and more idiots will come forward and demand airtime too, which is not what is needed.

[res0nat0r]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

when he says he represents the famillies of 9/11 I think you all should have more respect for those families. You should take him seriously.

Everybody has done stupid things in their past especially many of YOUR representatives in congress and senate.

i dont really know this answer as fact, but i can safely assume that 9/11 families DO NOT think charlie sheen represents them, and that this was a government cover up. they DO believe that terrorists from overseas killed their family members that day. not the government.

[Cj Tari]

Re: Charlie Sheen 9/11 Theory??

when he says he represents the famillies of 9/11 I think you all should have more respect for those families. You should take him seriously.

Everybody has done stupid things in their past especially many of YOUR representatives in congress and senate.

haha this is priceless, so let me get this clear, you dont think that this dude is taking advantage of this to get more attention? do you really think this dude is doing it for the families??

be realistic dude, you think anyone would want to sit down with carrothead to discuss the economy? or with will farrell to talk about wall street??