User-friendly P&R?

[clintlove]

Re: User-friendly P&R?

The search feature could function much more efficiently.

True, and I use the search function when I'm looking for something.

Why do we have the Hernan, Diggers, and Sasha sub forums then? Don't get me wrong I like having them up there, but what makes them more special than Fortier, Burridge, ect.?

[picklemonkey]

Re: User-friendly P&R?

I personally don't see the need for them either.

[Huggie Smiles]

Re: User-friendly P&R?

I like them - they are probably the most searched after (and reposted) of all the djs - prior to this there was multiple people asking can you post sasha 93 or digweed live or xxxxx ??? you get the point. This way they are all contained and its easy to redirect someone there.

[Kamal]

Re: User-friendly P&R?

yeah. Instead of marking a thread as read, though, I'd like to be able to just sort by thread creation date. same damned thing with less effort on a per thread basis imo

http://www.mercuryserver.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9

check the bottom. I know there is a template tweak for it somewhere on vbulletin.org - see example here http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=198

[picklemonkey]

Re: User-friendly P&R?

I've searched high and low for a template on vbulletin. it doesn't exist except on 4.0

[klangfabrik]

Re: User-friendly P&R?

just a thought, what about seperating radio shows, podcasts and real live sets instead of discussing a warren/howells subforum?

[Huggie Smiles]

Re: User-friendly P&R?

^^ becomes hard tho - as what about the radio shows that are live sets

[picklemonkey]

Re: User-friendly P&R?

I think some type of "Report dead link" functionality might be nice. Something where members could flag a thread as having a download link that doesn't work. But then what would happen after it's flagged

[floridaorange]

Re: User-friendly P&R?

^it would remain flagged until it was updated with a functioning link?

[picklemonkey]

Re: User-friendly P&R?

I guess. I'm just brainstorming here