Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

[runningman]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

I'm confused -- was he allowed to board without a passport at the urging of a "sharp dressed man," or was he allowed to board by his own volition notwithstanding that he was on a watch list? The two seem inconsistent.

As an aside, after my post last night, I happened to watch a documentary on this where they did a walk-through of his day, and they were very explicit about him having a Nigerian passport. They were quite critical of the current monitoring system as to people who are not on the no-fly list, but who are instead on a lower-level list, in that by design, it doesn't give monitors the opportunity to assess whether that person is a serious threat until about 30 minutes after takeoff.

He didn't have a passport and he was put on the plane by a shard dressed man. Kurt Haskell and his wife are Michigan lawyers who witnessed it all. They were talking about how he was a refugee and didn't have a passport.

[res0nat0r]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

[res0nat0r]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

Back on topic it looks like Britian has given an Israeli diplomat they think is a possible Mossad member the boot from the country.

http://www.economist.com/world/middle-east/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15763761&source=features_box_main

[toasty]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

He didn't have a passport and he was put on the plane by a shard dressed man. Kurt Haskell and his wife are Michigan lawyers who witnessed it all. They were talking about how he was a refugee and didn't have a passport.

OK, so then walk me through this. What is it that you think happened here, who was behind it, and why?

[floridaorange]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

[res0nat0r]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

lol

[runningman]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

Well it's pretty simple isn't it Toasty? Let's go over the facts

The gov't allowed him on the plane and was actually put on by a sharp dressed man.
The man with the bomb in his pants was a known terrorist because his father told the gov't that he was a potential terrorist
After the incident thousands of body scanners (which Chertoff is a lobby for) are sold around the world for airports.

Sounds like shotgun capitalism to me. You create the demand through an incident and go benefit from it. My father taught me a long time ago that you only have to follow the money to find out who was behind it. Because who was behind it is the one who benefits the most - Cui Bono?

Also it created jobs!!

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a06o3iOct3pU

The real question is now knowing the facts how could a known terrorist get on a plane with no passport? Who has that authority?

[res0nat0r]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

How about this:

How come no one (TSA inspectors, supervisors, police, etc) other than this one lawyer guy have talked to the media or any reporters about how they were forced to let this guy thru screening? ? If they were told by their higher ups to ignore standard protocol on this guy and the one every girl is crazy for, the sharp dressed man, why has no one else come foward? Not a single person who would have had to let this guy thru security hasnt talked? There should be a host of conspirators right?

[runningman]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

Do your own research!

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2e89jp1ykE[/YOUTUBE]


I am sick of this it can't be true because it isn't common sense shit!! Go look it up! Educate yourselves.

[res0nat0r]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

^You aren't making sense with that argument.

1] On this issue you believe ONE eyewitness and say that this MUST be true, vs the rest of the world.
2] On all of your 9/11 ramblings you believe a small subset, the AE911 folks (2000 or whatever amount of people) vs the rest of the world.

That is not common sense.

Since wikipedia is currently down:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor

Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor[1]), is the meta-theoretical principle that "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity" (entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem) and the conclusion thereof, that the simplest solution is usually the correct one.

[chunky]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

^You aren't making sense with that argument.

1] On this issue you believe ONE eyewitness and say that this MUST be true, vs the rest of the world.

It was 2 witnesses and their story should be easy enough to verify unless Amsterdam Airport has antique CCTV

[res0nat0r]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

It's never been verified. Oops.

[Jenks]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

antique CCTV

you're getting a LOT of mileage out of that one bro.

[chunky]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

yeah its been keeping me laughing a week. And when I say antique I mean English antique not American

[chunky]

Re: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Assassination

It's never been verified. Oops.

Save it for the windows