The War on Truthers

[runningman]

Re: The War on Truthers

Reso don't disgrace my boys track.

Happy New Year Politics Section!!

[chunky]

Re: The War on Truthers

Reso don't disgrace my boys track.

Happy New Year Politics Section!!

You and him can't both like that track because in Res0 world (where everything is black & white) you would both agree on something which would mean you and him would be holocaust deniers bt default. Or has he created a paradox?

[CircleGuy]

Re: The War on Truthers

You and him can't both like that track because in Res0 world (where everything is black & white) you would both agree on something which would mean you and him would be holocaust deniers bt default. Or has he created a paradox?

what makes you so sure that your videos/stats/figures are all 100% correct? the simplest answer is always the best and most logical one

[res0nat0r]

Re: The War on Truthers

what makes you so sure that your videos/stats/figures are all 100% correct? the simplest answer is always the best and most logical one

From the krazy old skool: Occams Razor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor

But...gots to be funded by the US (even though its about 500 years too early), so it can't hold any weight

[chunky]

Re: The War on Truthers

what makes you so sure that your videos/stats/figures are all 100% correct? the simplest answer is always the best and most logical one

Like building 7 having all the characteristics of a controled demolition and being the only steel framed building to be brought down as a result of fire.

[CircleGuy]

Re: The War on Truthers

lol @ controlled demolition

it's common sense that if the support structures of a building are damaged then it's likely to fall. damaged supports can only hold so much weight for a certain amount of time before they collapse. buildings were not meant to withstand airplane attacks

[bobjuice]

Re: The War on Truthers

if the support structures of a building are damaged then it's likely to fall.

No it isn't

buildings were not meant to withstand airplane attacks

Yes they are

[trick12]

Re: The War on Truthers

lol @ controlled demolition

it's common sense that if the support structures of a building are damaged then it's likely to fall. damaged supports can only hold so much weight for a certain amount of time before they collapse. buildings were not meant to withstand airplane attacks

wow, just when i thought it couldnt get worse

[CircleGuy]

Re: The War on Truthers

i was speaking of a building damaged BY an airplane attack. the initial explosion and fire will damage the support structures and affect the building's structural integrity

[chunky]

Re: The War on Truthers

lol @ controlled demolition

it's common sense that if the support structures of a building are damaged then it's likely to fall. damaged supports can only hold so much weight for a certain amount of time before they collapse. buildings were not meant to withstand airplane attacks

John Skilling was the head structural engineer for the World Trade Center. In a 1993 interview, Skilling stated that the Towers were designed to withstand the impact and fires resulting from the collision of a large jetliner such as Boeing 707 or Douglas DC-8.

Yes they were designed to withstand and aircraft collision and with the fuel load. This has been verified many times before. Miro tried to use this argument before using one of the architects Aaron Swirsky (check out Aaron Swirsky at 17.45 on the video below)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8707513149655779206&q=source%3A000974024203882481900&hl=en#

NIST argued that the plane in mind when the towers where being designed was a lot smaller
and carried less fuel than the planes that hit the towers. It's all in the Astonishing thread. There was nowhere near enough damage or fire on Building 7 for a collapse to occur. Get Res0 to show you the photo.

You also have the Madrid skyscraper fire burned for 2 days and didn't collapse.



Deepwater Horizon oil burned for 7 days with a constant fuel supply and the structure didn't weaken

[chunky]

Re: The War on Truthers

i was speaking of a building damaged BY an airplane attack. the initial explosion and fire will damage the support structures and affect the building's structural integrity

According to NIST in order for this to happen all of the fire protection on the steel columns would have had to have been removed. NIST clam this happened as a result of the impact of the plane. you can also check out Thomas Eager at 20 minutes

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8707513149655779206&q=source%3A000974024203882481900&hl=en#

[res0nat0r]

Re: The War on Truthers

Also in other building explosions which have no relevance to the Twin Towers, I give you the Nakatomi Building:



Great Christmas movie BTW. Happy Holidays everyone.

[trick12]

Re: The War on Truthers

~1 hour and ~1 hour and 45 mins actually.

did it take that long for the Nakatomi Building as well? i guess you came up with the 1hr45mins based on the movie run time

btw i dont believe that the american government as a whole planned and knew about the attacks.

[res0nat0r]

Re: The War on Truthers

did it take that long for the Nakatomi Building as well? i guess you came up with the 1hr45mins based on the movie run time.

General times (hence the ~) from wikipedia. I'm sure they sourced their info from the official records.

[chunky]

Re: The War on Truthers

I'm sure they sourced their info from the official records.

Like NIST

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-6BDraft.pdf