-
It was fun while it lasted...
-
Re: The War on Truthers
Res0 logic
Someone had to bring this back. Maybe I should make it my signatureHow about, the building was built in the 1940's, meaning it is 70 years old. This is the US gov't. My local bar has better security than most outdated gov't shit, unfortunately since you don't live here you don't know how much bullshit goes on with the US gov't. So totally believable that there are no cameras covering every square inch of this building.
It is almost at wide as the Empire State Building is tall.Last edited by chunky; January 9, 2011, 01:34:33 PM.Originally posted by res0nat0r
Comment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
glad you liked the image
Comment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
antique cctvComment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
CIA Asset Susan Lindauer blowing the whistle on 9/11 and Iraq, and Israel on the Kevin Barret radio show.
I prefer the interview she gave on http://theuglytruth.podbean.com/ with host Mark Glenn.“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
― Marcus Tullius CiceroComment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
interesting...thanksCIA Asset Susan Lindauer blowing the whistle on 9/11 and Iraq, and Israel on the Kevin Barret radio show.
.Comment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
No problem. Part 2 of her interview wll be on next week.
When Susan decribes the call she made to her brother, warning him to stay out of New York, southern Manhattan, she also metions that the attacks were imminent, will cause mass casualties, involved highjacked planes targeting WTC and possibly loaded with a 'nuclear device'.
Now she doesn't mention 'nuclear device' for no reason, the threat is real. If you're not familiar with the stolen nukes built in South Africa by Israel, then get on board and have a listen as Gordan Duff and Jeff Gates fill in all the blanks.
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
― Marcus Tullius CiceroComment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
im really fucking confused by what the fuck you are trying to say. try rephrasing the question in a form which the majority of the people here can understand and maybe i'll reiterate myself for the 100th time so you can keep giggling to yourself about
Comment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
Question 1
Do you think one plane hitting one building is a multiple attack? How many more times do I have to ask
Question 2
Was a 707 the largest plane in operation at the at the time of the design of the building
How many more times do I have to ask. matbe you should get a Rosetta Stone Res0Originally posted by res0nat0rComment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
I'd say one. Now I'm sure you will follow up with some misinterpretation of the English language of some post you are about to cite, and also post something extremely irrelevant. But I already answered this in post #274, which is what I'm sure you are getting at. (look for the purple)
Yes/No/Maybe/Whocares? It is irrelevant.Question 2
Was a 707 the largest plane in operation at the at the time of the design of the building
How many more times do I have to ask. matbe you should get a Rosetta Stone Res0
I also answered this in post #283
Sigh.Comment
-
The Idiots ARE Winning.
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect."
Mark Twain
SOBRIETY MIXComment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
yahoo we can get going. So you are saying that a Boeing 767 aircraft (is about 20 percent bigger than a Boeing 707)
Look at the picture below the
Length 707 is 153' 20% more would make it about 30' longer instead it's only 6'
Wingspan 707 is 146' 20% more would make it 29' wider instead it's only 10'
Tail 707 is 38' is 46' so yes the tail is bigger
Take Off weight 707 336,000 20% more would make it 403.
They when you take into account the plane wasn't fully loaded or fully fueled that number drops. So its safe to say with the exception of the tail its not 20% bigger
Originally posted by res0nat0rComment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
Can you highlight it in purple
Yes/No/Maybe/Whocares? It is irrelevant.
I also answered this in post #283
Sigh.Originally posted by res0nat0rComment
Tweet
MercuryServer, MercuryServer Logo and all uniquely developed images are the sole property of MercuryServer.com. Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Comment