-
Originally posted by res0nat0r
-
Re: The War on Truthers
it's a last ditch resort that they have used a thousand times instead of intellectual conversation.Comment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
Anyone miss the good old days when we had Miro & Toasty to talk to? Before they got replaced with a couple of bellendsOriginally posted by res0nat0rComment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
They've grown tired of having 'intellectual conversation' with you two.Comment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
Taibbi is delusional and in denial, just like all the other nutters who actually believe in the official story.“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
― Marcus Tullius CiceroComment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
Comment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
how about them premature bbc premature reports eh? what a an embrassment.Comment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
Care to extrapolate
No, but I do believe Yao saw that documentary, and I do believe the Pentagon was built similar to that of a bunker and I do believe a plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11 because that is the case.
Guess this newscaster is also lying and essentially damaging his reputation and any credibility his news team has built over the years in Washington, yes?
Originally posted by res0nat0rComment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
^^ok? and?
It was fun while it lasted...
Comment
-
Re: The War on Truthers
Another fav
Apr 24th, 2010 | By Keelan Balderson | Category: News Archive, September 11th - 9/11 Truth
In a hit piece that has turned around and bit them on the ass, Fox News has admitted what the alternative research community have been saying for years, that Building 7, the third building to collapse on the horrific 9/11 attacks, was planned to be demolished by Larry Silverstein.
As written by Jeffrey Scott Shapiro on FoxNews.com
Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.
A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy.’
NIST’s report was that the building came down due to internal fires – however they presumably did not have this information before conducting the investigation, adding to the damning evidence that we were not told the truth about what happened that day.
Originally posted by res0nat0rComment
Tweet
MercuryServer, MercuryServer Logo and all uniquely developed images are the sole property of MercuryServer.com. Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Comment