If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you think she knew about it because she was part of the conspiracy than all there is to say is that you are more fucking gullible than I have words for.
Reason me this: Why the fuck would a BBC reporter be in the loop if this was all perpetuated by the gov't? I mean fucking seriously?
I have checked out all the 9/11 conspiracy theories and watched their videos, etc and although i don't buy them, the collapse of building 7 has always been puzzling.
Now this came out yesterday (at least thats when I saw it on the news) and I still dont feel satisfied.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/22/nyregion/22wtccnd.html
Fantastic thinking. Sooooooo....I love how all of the enlightened who seek 'the troof' demand millions of pieces of evidence and 1080p HDTV footage of this, or they keep spouting the same nonsense, that it couldn't have possibly happened.
Do you believe that the government have footage of the attack, other than the one that has been officialy released? Which by the way shows absolutely nothing, except for that huge fire ball.
Did you see a plane of any kind, hitting the pentagon?
And in regards to the pentagon attacks, we are not asking for 'millions of pieces of evidence'. All we are asking for is one.
It's impossible that the government isn't in possesion of any footage which shows a plane, however big or small actually hitting the pentagon.
It doesn't make any sense at all.
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
Perception is an interesting thing isn't it. 9/11 may be hard to swallow, but that doesn't mean Bush was behind it or that the US Government perpetuated it.
I'm literally done discussing this topic though.
I don't think Bush (merely a puppet, remember?) necessarily set it in motion or that our elected officials elaborately schemed it, but I do think something (rotten) in our govt. facilitated it by using a band of Islamic extremist misfits to further their agenda.
Do you believe that the government have footage of the attack, other than the one that has been officialy released? Which by the way shows absolutely nothing, except for that huge fire ball.
Did you see a plane of any kind, hitting the pentagon?
And in regards to the pentagon attacks, we are not asking for 'millions of pieces of evidence'. All we are asking for is one.
It's impossible that the government isn't in possesion of any footage which shows a plane, however big or small actually hitting the pentagon.
It doesn't make any sense at all.
What will seeing an actual moving picture show of a plane hitting the Pentagon prove to you that the evidence that already exists out there hasn't given you up to this point? Why is multiple eyewitnesses on the ground and plane debris in the buildings not enough? This sounds like the standard silly 'truther' rhetoric of setting the bar here, and then justifying everything is a coverup until someone rises to meet your criteria, then the bar gets moved yet again.
What will seeing an actual moving picture show of a plane hitting the Pentagon prove to you that the evidence that already exists out there hasn't given you up to this point? Why is multiple eyewitnesses on the ground and plane debris in the buildings not enough?
Well it will make the story a lot more believable. No eyewitnesses and stories of debris inside the building are not enough.
Well it will make the story a lot more believable. No eyewitnesses and stories of debris inside the building are not enough.
*No eyewitnesses?* Really? Also debris are not enough? Why not? I'm pretty sure it is not enough because then the whole conspiracy drumbeat can't keep being played on if that were 'enough'.
*No eyewitnesses?* Really? Also debris are not enough? Why not? I'm pretty sure it is not enough because then the whole conspiracy drumbeat can't keep being played on if that were 'enough'.
These eyewitness stories don't seem to correlate with each other why is why people require more solid proof
These eyewitness stories don't seem to correlate with each other why is why people require more solid proof
Of course not when the sources are out of context youtube clippings from news reports trying to deliberately distort what everyone knows what happened that day....
Of course not when the sources are out of context youtube clippings from news reports trying to deliberately distort what everyone knows what happened that day....
Seems the Bush administration did a good job of distorting what happened that day themselves.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Why not? I'm pretty sure it is not enough because then the whole conspiracy drumbeat can't keep being played on if that were 'enough'.
Comment