Building 7

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • floridaorange
    I'm merely a humble butler
    • Dec 2005
    • 29116

    Building 7

    As much as I regret starting this thread as it lends a fraction of validity to a complete false and invalid argument, I'm willing to have a go at each of the individual 9/11 conspiracies 1 thread at a time.

    One lesson I've learned that as soon as you cover 1 topic, someone brings up another, and said topic gets left in the dust, which is why we go in circles discussing 9/11.


    The following is enough information for me to understand the dynamics of Building 7. If you need more information than this, you may want to look at why you are so mistrusting.


    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    The following quotes from those involved with WTC 7 should dispel any claims that the building was relatively undamaged and was brought down by a controlled demolition.

    Those on the scene describe very heavy structural damage as well as numerous fires left to burn unchecked for hours.

    According to demolitions experts, the term "pulled" means to literally pull down a building with cables and ropes. It is not used to describe a controlled demolition.

    Silverstein's Quote:
    "I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, you know, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is just pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

    -Fact which is undisputed by either side, he was talking to the fire commander
    -Fact which is undisputed by either side, both are not in the demolition business
    Silverstein's spokesperson, Mr. McQuillan, later clarified:


    "In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.

    He could be lying, right? But here is the corroborating evidence...
    "They told us to get out of there because they were worried about 7 World Trade Center, which is right behind it, coming down. We were up on the upper floors of the Verizon building looking at it. You could just see the whole bottom corner of the building was gone. We could look right out over to where the Trade Centers were because we were that high up. Looking over the smaller buildings. I just remember it was tremendous, tremendous fires going on. Finally they pulled us out. They said all right, get out of that building because that 7, they were really worried about. They pulled us out of there and then they regrouped everybody on Vesey Street, between the water and West Street. They put everybody back in there. Finally it did come down. From there - this is much later on in the day, because every day we were so worried about that building we didn't really want to get people close. They were trying to limit the amount of people that were in there. Finally it did come down." - Richard Banaciski
    http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...2_WTC_GRAPHIC/

    Banaciski_Richard.txt

    Here is more evidence they pulled the teams out waiting for a normal collapse from fire...
    "The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was the collapse (Of the WTC towers) had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, World Trade Center collapsed completely" - Daniel Nigro, Chief of Department
    http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...2_WTC_GRAPHIC/

    Nigro_Daniel.txt

    "Early on, there was concern that 7 World Trade Center might have been both impacted by the collapsing tower and had several fires in it and there was a concern that it might collapse. So we instructed that a collapse area -- (Q. A collapse zone?) -- Yeah -- be set up and maintained so that when the expected collapse of 7 happened, we wouldn't have people working in it. There was considerable discussion with Con Ed regarding the substation in that building and the feeders and the oil coolants and so on. And their concern was of the type of fire we might have when it collapsed." - Chief Cruthers
    http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...12_WTC_GRAPHIC
    /Cruthers.txt


    "Then we found out, I guess around 3:00 [o'clock], that they thought 7 was going to collapse. So, of course, [we've] got guys all in this pile over here and the main concern was get everybody out, and I guess it took us over an hour and a half, two hours to get everybody out of there. (Q. Initially when you were there, you had said you heard a few Maydays?) Oh, yes. We had Maydays like crazy.... The heat must have been tremendous. There was so much [expletive] fire there. This whole pile was burning like crazy. Just the heat and the smoke from all the other buildings on fire, you [couldn't] see anything. So it took us a while and we ended up backing everybody out, and [that's] when 7 collapsed.... Basically, we fell back for 7 to collapse, and then we waited a while and it got a lot more organized, I would guess." - Lieutenant William Ryan
    http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...12_WTC_GRAPHIC
    /Ryan_William.txt


    "Firehouse: Did that chief give an assignment to go to building 7?

    Boyle: He gave out an assignment. I didnt know exactly what it was, but he told the chief that we were heading down to the site.

    Firehouse: How many companies?

    Boyle: There were four engines and at least three trucks. So were heading east on Vesey, we couldnt see much past Broadway. We couldnt see Church Street. We couldnt see what was down there. It was really smoky and dusty."

    "A little north of Vesey I said, well go down, lets see whats going on. A couple of the other officers and I were going to see what was going on. We were told to go to Greenwich and Vesey and see whats going on. So we go there and on the north and east side of 7 it didnt look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didnt look good.

    But they had a hoseline operating. Like I said, it was hitting the sidewalk across the street, but eventually they pulled back too. Then we received an order from Fellini, were going to make a move on 7. That was the first time really my stomach tightened up because the building didnt look good. I was figuring probably the standpipe systems were shot. There was no hydrant pressure. I wasnt really keen on the idea. Then this other officer Im standing next to said, that building doesnt look straight. So Im standing there. Im looking at the building. It didnt look right, but, well, well go in, well see.

    So we gathered up rollups and most of us had masks at that time. We headed toward 7. And just around we were about a hundred yards away and Butch Brandies came running up. He said forget it, nobodys going into 7, theres creaking, there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped. And probably about 10 minutes after that, Visconti, he was on West Street, and I guess he had another report of further damage either in some basements and things like that, so Visconti said nobody goes into 7, so that was the final thing and that was abandoned.

    Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?

    Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.

    Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?

    Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, well head back to the command post.
    We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.

    http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/9.../gz/boyle.html

    (Broken Link Cached here: http://www.webcitation.org/5IuRwM61d )
    This proves there was a big hole on the south side of the building. From the photographic evidence and these quotes which aren't meant to be technical, I suspect there was a large hole in the center of the building which may have gone up 10 stories connected to a large rip on the left side of the building which continued up another 10 or more stories. Together they would make "a hole 20 stories tall".
    Hayden: Yeah. There was enough there and we were marking off. There were a lot of damaged apparatus there that were covered. We tried to get searches in those areas. By now, this is going on into the afternoon, and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 oclock in the afternoon, but by about 2 oclock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

    Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?

    Hayden: No, not right away, and thats probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didnt make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the

    Firehouse: Chief Nigro said they made a collapse zone and wanted everybody away from number 7 did you have to get all of those people out?

    Hayden: Yeah, we had to pull everybody back. It was very difficult. We had to be very forceful in getting the guys out. They didnt want to come out. There were guys going into areas that I wasnt even really comfortable with, because of the possibility of secondary collapses. We didnt know how stable any of this area was. We pulled everybody back probably by 3 or 3:30 in the afternoon. We said, this building is going to come down, get back. It came down about 5 oclock or so, but we had everybody backed away by then. At that point in time, it seemed like a somewhat smaller event, but under any normal circumstances, thats a major event, a 47-story building collapsing. It seemed like a firecracker after the other ones came down, but I mean thats a big building, and when it came down, it was quite an event. But having gone through the other two, it didnt seem so bad. But thats what we were concerned about. We had said to the guys, we lost as many as 300 guys. We didnt want to lose any more people that day. And when those numbers start to set in among everybody My feeling early on was we werent going to find any survivors. You either made it out or you didnt make it out. It was a cataclysmic event. The idea of somebody living in that thing to me would have been only short of a miracle. This thing became geographically sectored because of the collapse. I was at West and Liberty. I couldnt go further north on West Street. And I couldnt go further east on Liberty because of the collapse of the south tower, so physically we were boxed in.

    http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/9...gz/hayden.htmlsurface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.

    (Broken Link - Ask Firehouse.com)
    It mirrors what Silverstein said.
    WTC Building 7 appears to have suffered significant damage at some point after the WTC Towers had collapsed, according to firefighters at the scene. Firefighter Butch Brandies tells other firefighters that nobody is to go into Building 7 because of creaking and noises coming out of there. [Firehouse Magazine, 8/02]
    Battalion Chief John Norman later recalls, "At the edge of the south face you could see that it is very heavily damaged." [Firehouse Magazine, 5/02]
    Heavy, thick smoke rises near 7 World Trade Center. Smoke is visible from the upper floors of the 47-story building. Firefighters using transits to determine whether there was any movement in the structure were surprised to discover that is was moving. The area was evacuated and the building collapsed later in the afternoon of Sept. 11.

    As for Building 7 and the evidence for Controlled Demolition, let's review the evidence...
    What we do have for sure.

    1) Fireman saying there was "a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors." "I would say it was probably about a third of it".

    2) A laymen officer the fireman was standing next to said, "that building doesnt look straight." He then says "It didnt look right".

    3) They put a transit on it and afterward were "pretty sure she was going to collapse."

    4) They "saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13".

    5) Photographic evidence of a fire directly under the penthouse which collapsed first.

    6) The penthouse fell first, followed by the rest of the building shortly after.

    7) The collapse happened from the bottom.

    Photographic evidence of large smoke plumes against the back of B7. Plumes of smoke so large you can't see the entire rear of the 47 story office building.


    9) Silverstein is not a demolition expert and was talking to a fire fighter and not a demolition expert. Why would he use the word "Pull" to describe the demolition to a fire fighter?

    10) Silverstein denies "Pull" means "Controlled demolition". He said it means "Pull" the teams out of the building.

    11) Silverstein did not make the decision to "Pull". (Whatever that means) "they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse"

    12) Another fire fighter used "Pull" to describe the decision made to get him out of the building.

    Maybe none of these things by themselves mean anything but together it means there is no case. The person who said "Pull" and started this cascade later clarified. Fireman use the word "Pull" to describe getting out of a building and the person who made the order was not Silverstein according to the same first interview.


    It was fun while it lasted...
  • floridaorange
    I'm merely a humble butler
    • Dec 2005
    • 29116

    #2
    Re: Building 7

    Please do not respond to this thread until you have literally read through the above information.

    It was fun while it lasted...

    Comment

    • chunky
      Someone MARRY ME!! LOL
      • Jan 2006
      • 10551

      #3
      Re: Building 7

      Surley you should of posted this in here your going to upset jenks now.

      I have checked out all the 9/11 conspiracy theories and watched their videos, etc and although i don't buy them, the collapse of building 7 has always been puzzling. Now this came out yesterday (at least thats when I saw it on the news) and I still dont feel satisfied. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/22/nyregion/22wtccnd.html


      If I was going to discribe pulling people from a building i wouldnt use the word IT, but thats just me.

      You mite want to check out Megastructures: Miami Demolition as to the use of the word Pull It.
      I mite be able to find a link to it after I've watched the rest of Res0's movie.

      You mite want to check out this to

      Originally posted by res0nat0r
      OK Lets All Stroke Ron Pauls Cock On 3!

      Comment

      • floridaorange
        I'm merely a humble butler
        • Dec 2005
        • 29116

        #4
        Re: Building 7

        And I wouldn't naturally think to use the words or term "fully executed" when describing a contract that's been filled out. But different words are used at different times for different reasons under different circumstances.

        Moreover, in the midst of a disaster the size of 9/11 guess what?


        Who knows what would come out of your mouth if you lived in NYC and you had personal relationships with tenants of buildings you owned just blocks away from one of America's worst terror attacks.

        It was fun while it lasted...

        Comment

        • Jenks
          I'm kind of a big deal.
          • Jun 2004
          • 10250

          #5
          Re: Building 7

          Originally posted by chunky
          Surley you should of posted this in here your going to upset jenks now.
          .

          Comment

          • floridaorange
            I'm merely a humble butler
            • Dec 2005
            • 29116

            #6
            Re: Building 7

            I'm not adding to a Shosh thread, sorry shosh, no offense pal

            It was fun while it lasted...

            Comment

            • dig72
              Gold Gabber
              • Nov 2004
              • 882

              #7
              Re: Building 7

              In February this year, Andrew Joseph flew a plane directly into tax office in Florida.

              Have a look at the picture and look at the damage the direct impact caused.



              Makes you wonder.
              “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
              Marcus Tullius Cicero

              Comment

              • floridaorange
                I'm merely a humble butler
                • Dec 2005
                • 29116

                #8
                Re: Building 7

                ^Are you intentionally being thick dig72?


                (and fyi, it was TEXAS)

                It was fun while it lasted...

                Comment

                • runningman
                  Playa I'm a Sooth Saya
                  • Jun 2004
                  • 5995

                  #9
                  Re: Building 7

                  your post still doesn't explain the building falling at free fall speed into the most resistance?

                  I notice you also left out the "it" part... "pull it"

                  Comment

                  • floridaorange
                    I'm merely a humble butler
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 29116

                    #10
                    Re: Building 7

                    Originally posted by runningman
                    your post still doesn't explain the building falling at free fall speed into the most resistance?
                    define free fall speed, based on it being demolished due to the level of fire damage it incurred.

                    Oh and also, are you f*cking kidding me?

                    It was fun while it lasted...

                    Comment

                    • runningman
                      Playa I'm a Sooth Saya
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 5995

                      #11
                      Re: Building 7

                      free fall speed - The rate at which objects fall to the earth.

                      Are u kidding me?

                      Comment

                      • floridaorange
                        I'm merely a humble butler
                        • Dec 2005
                        • 29116

                        #12
                        Re: Building 7

                        ^So is this the only point than that I should assume you are refuting?

                        Because it is my sense that even if I did overcome your objection (with: The top portion of the building fell at free fall acceleration before slowing down upon meeting resistance)
                        you would then move to a different topic altogether....

                        ...a typical RM tactic btw.

                        It was fun while it lasted...

                        Comment

                        • runningman
                          Playa I'm a Sooth Saya
                          • Jun 2004
                          • 5995

                          #13
                          Re: Building 7

                          no, buildings falling at free fall speed is my issue. Free fall would mean no resistance. you can't have it both ways.. You can't say free fall for some and then not free fall later. Free fall is free fall.

                          Go ahead Newton prove me wrong.

                          Also what about the crimp right before it fell? Or the explosions heard by everyone?

                          Comment

                          • floridaorange
                            I'm merely a humble butler
                            • Dec 2005
                            • 29116

                            #14
                            Re: Building 7

                            ^I'm sorry, are you a structural engineer?

                            AND stay on topic you speed-trap shaygitz.

                            It was fun while it lasted...

                            Comment

                            • runningman
                              Playa I'm a Sooth Saya
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 5995

                              #15
                              Re: Building 7

                              No but I know where to find 1139 A and E's.. you?

                              Comment

                              Working...