Why does the media send its full attention to the 120,000+ dead from a natural disaster, when 1,000,000+ are being slaughtered in Sudan?
I guess it's harder to take a moral stance on a pack of evil individuals, who knows? Is there more emotion?
I'm seeing no media coverage of the slaughter in Sudan. It's absent.
I guess it's harder to take a moral stance on a pack of evil individuals, who knows? Is there more emotion?
I'm seeing no media coverage of the slaughter in Sudan. It's absent.
Comment