John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

[salami]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

BOOOOOM HERE'S DIGWEED

EM of the DECADE !.

[conbutts]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

Yeah baby!!

[simonr]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

This is so far beyond amazing it's unreal

Definately summed up the Sankeys vortex from 2 weeeks ago ... so here's the definitive tracklist.



John Digweed : Essential Mix (29-May-2010)

01. DiRTY dOERing - Loco (Vince Watson Ambient Remix) [Damage Music Berlin DMBpromo]
02. DiRTY dOERing - Loco (D- Func Remix) [Damage Music Berlin DMBpromo]
03. Darko Esser - Bofkont (King Roc Remix) [Wolfskuil Records WOLF 017.3]
04. Kev Obrien - Valentines & 909'S (MANIK's 808s Remix) [Deep Vein Audio DVA001]
05. Triangle - Five/We've Found It feat. Mark Ridout (King Unique Remix) [Flow Vinyl FV025]
06. Juspio - Frozen Light (Chris Fortier 40oz Remix) [Olris Records OLARIS057]
07. Chaim - Love Rehab (Dub) [Bpitch Control BPC212]
08. Loco Dice - Definition (Nic Fanciulli) [Desolat Promo]
09. Flavio Diaz & Kaiserdisco - Jaune [Drumcode Records DC64]
10. GMJ - First There Was Sound (Jamie Stevens Remix) [Open Records OPNDG013]
11. TDR - Squelch (Koen Groeneveld Remix) [Doorn Records DOORN037]
12. Danilo Vigorito - Prima [Plus 8 Records PLUS8113]
13. Cirez D - The Tumble [Mouseville Mouseville 014]
14. Ian O'Donovan - Aurora Borealis [Bedrock Records Bed90]
15. Pryda - Untitled [Pryda Recordings Promo]
16. Slam - Room 2 (Pan Pot Rave Tool) [Paragraph Records Paragraph 6d]
17. Humano - Life [Music Man MM149]
18. John Digweed & Nick Muir - Meteor [Bedrock Records Promo]
19. Abe Duque - Hypocrisy (John Digweed & Nick Muir Remix) [Process Recordings Promo]
20. Secret Cinema - Glad Chord (Psycatron Remix) [Gem Records GEM003]
21. Marco Bailey & Tom Hades - Brabant [MB Elektronics MBELEK058]
22. Luis Junior - Bg [Bedrock Records Bed91]

[demonAfro]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

Here's the aac version from the bbc (it's 128k but imo the best quality except for a high quality FM rip....)

aac || 128 kbps || 1:58:44 || 110 MB

http://rapidshare.com/files/392891529/JohnDigweed20100529EssentialMix.m4a

[hashhead]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

you can hear in johns voice in the intro how bad the quality is of original rips
'orrible

fingers crossed better appears

cheers for the above^

[feather]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

Now for the Kiss set when it's up on MS.

[cm1179]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

as expected these days the usual shit audio quality essential mix (VBR joint stereo), why cant people encode these at 320? or is this just a stream rip off the Radio 1 site??
if anyone finds a better quality rip please post it!!!

i could be wrong but i don't think encoding at 320k makes a difference, i think it's all down to the original stream

can't you just be happy with the mix as it is?

[glannie]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

Exactly, it's no use encoding this @ 320k. It only creates a larger file with the exact same quality.
VBR was created for these purposes. The encoder thinks about what quality the specific sample should be before encoding it, so that as a human you wouldnt hear the difference between the encode and the original sample. Then on to the next sample exactly the same process is repeated. Complete silence for example you cant hear a difference in when it's encoded @ 32kbps or 320kbps. So silent parts get encoded at a lower bitrate (complete silence = 32kbps). All of this done to save space on your hd

That being said the source of these recordings are digital sat or cable which can be compared to an average flow of 160/192kbps tops. They CANT go higher! So if you made a 320kbps recording of this all you would have is the exact same recording just about twice as big

[chunky]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

Exactly, it's no use encoding this @ 320k. It only creates a larger file with the exact same quality.
VBR was created for these purposes. The encoder thinks about what quality the specific sample should be before encoding it, so that as a human you wouldnt hear the difference between the encode and the original sample. Then on to the next sample exactly the same process is repeated. Complete silence for example you cant hear a difference in when it's encoded @ 32kbps or 320kbps. So silent parts get encoded at a lower bitrate (complete silence = 32kbps). All of this done to save space on your hd

That being said the source of these recordings are digital sat or cable which can be compared to an average flow of 160/192kbps tops. They CANT go higher! So if you made a 320kbps recording of this all you would have is the exact same recording just about twice as big

Amazing how many people judge with their eyes instead of their ears

[demonAfro]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

Exactly, it's no use encoding this @ 320k. It only creates a larger file with the exact same quality.
VBR was created for these purposes. The encoder thinks about what quality the specific sample should be before encoding it, so that as a human you wouldnt hear the difference between the encode and the original sample. Then on to the next sample exactly the same process is repeated. Complete silence for example you cant hear a difference in when it's encoded @ 32kbps or 320kbps. So silent parts get encoded at a lower bitrate (complete silence = 32kbps). All of this done to save space on your hd

That being said the source of these recordings are digital sat rips or cable rips which can be compared to an average flow of 160/192kbps tops. They CANT go higher! So if you made a 320kbps recording of this all you would have is the exact same recording just about twice as big

Aye! Someone's got their head screwed on

The rips from digital radio and tv are a maximum of 192 kbps mp2 which subjectively lands somewhere between 128 and 160 mp3 as a raw stream and transcoding to mp3 will degrade the quality anyway. Very good FM can get much higher quality but as analogue it is hard to quantify especially as the beeb will probably do some in-house processing. Best to hope for is for JD to release his own copy

[feather]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

That's what happens when they have no understanding of the technology.

[glannie]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

Thanks lads, here's hoping for JD to release his own copy yeah

Got some fix in ID's
@58mins coming in is 12. Danilo Vigorito - Prima
@63mins coming in is 13. Cirez D - The Tumble

[mades]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

FM broadcasts are always limited to 15.5Khz or so lowpass. It has no sense to use 320k.

[Jesus@1]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

This EM is fucking quality, one of the best I've heard Diggers play. Slight correction to the tracklisting. Track 12 is Danilo Vigorito - Prima from the EP Primal Scream.

[hashhead]

Re: John Digweed Radio 1's Essential Mix, May 29, 2010

Aye! Someone's got their head screwed on

The rips from digital radio and tv are a maximum of 192 kbps mp2 which subjectively lands somewhere between 128 and 160 mp3 as a raw stream and transcoding to mp3 will degrade the quality anyway. Very good FM can get much higher quality but as analogue it is hard to quantify especially as the beeb will probably do some in-house processing. Best to hope for is for JD to release his own copy

exactly

fingers crossed