Tom Delay: Mean-spirited or Moronic?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • toasty
    Sir Toastiness
    • Jun 2004
    • 6585

    Tom Delay: Mean-spirited or Moronic?

    Check this out. At yesterday morning's Congressional Prayer Service Tom Delay read a little from Matthew 7 and evidently emphasized the following verses:

    24. Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:
    25. And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.
    26. And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:
    27. And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.
    Now I'm not suggesting that Delay would be so mean-spirited as to send a shot across the bow to the victims of the tsunami, but how stupid does he have to be to bring out that particular passage at this point in history? Surely there was some other language that could have been used at the service -- I just can't fathom that sort of insensitivity.

    Is this same passage read at every Congressional Prayer Service? Someone please tell me that it is...
  • thesightless
    Someone will marry me. Hell Yeah!
    • Jun 2004
    • 13567

    #2
    no, most catholic churches follow a schedule of scripture(i used to be an alter boy in elementary school, and no i wasn't touched ), it very well could have been a coincidence or an overlooked thingy. but if it was intentionally picked it is pretty bad. i would have gone with some old testement stuff about noah after the floods and the the surviving the floods.
    your life is an occasion, rise to it.

    Join My Chant. new mix. april 09. dirty fuck house.
    download that. deep shit listed there

    my dick is its own superhero.

    Comment

    • neoee
      Platinum Poster
      • Jun 2004
      • 1266

      #3
      The real question here should be why do we have a Congressional Prayer Service in the first place? I read some time ago that theres even a Senate Chaplin who's salary is 100K+ a year. Good to see seperation of church and state works so well. :?
      "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." -Benjamin Franklin

      Comment

      • DaStottman
        Addiction started
        • Dec 2004
        • 330

        #4
        Originally posted by neoee
        The real question here should be why do we have a Congressional Prayer Service in the first place? I read some time ago that theres even a Senate Chaplin who's salary is 100K+ a year. Good to see seperation of church and state works so well. :?
        Good luck trying to separate Church and state. Biblical stuff is printed all over buildings in Washington, plus our currency, etc.
        My Top 5 Tunes Of The Moment:

        Beckers - Fake (Greg Churchill Remix)
        4Mal - Twilight
        Formulate - The Voice Of Qi
        Mat Leutwyler & Jason Suzuki - The Contended Gastronome (Kosmas Epsilon Remix)
        Classic Tune: Djum Djum - Difference

        Comment

        • neoee
          Platinum Poster
          • Jun 2004
          • 1266

          #5
          Yeah I know. I can live with religious statements on our currency, but in this instance we're using tax dollars to pay for a job that should clearly not exist.
          "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." -Benjamin Franklin

          Comment

          • face
            Getting Somewhere
            • Jun 2004
            • 179

            #6
            uhh i think we have those in the military as well...


            this country is founded on christian protestant ethics and principles and there ain't much ya can do bout it!

            i cried and cried, but figured it's not worth it any more. i just ignore all the religious crap. i can't wait till i have to go to court and swear on the bible. i could lie my ass off and claim that my oath was invalid as the book upon which i swore meant nothing to me. think that would work?

            DJ Mixes | Music Reviews | Podcast | iTunes Podcast | RSS Feed | SoundCloud

            Comment

            • toasty
              Sir Toastiness
              • Jun 2004
              • 6585

              #7
              Originally posted by face
              i can't wait till i have to go to court and swear on the bible. i could lie my ass off and claim that my oath was invalid as the book upon which i swore meant nothing to me. think that would work?
              Nope. There is no requirement that you swear on a Bible -- it is a matter of convention only, and people can and do choose not to use the Bible and/or to "affirm" rather than swear all the time. Whether you gets busted for perjury for lying is a matter between you and the court -- whether you believe that swearing on a Bible or not has any significance is up to you.

              Comment

              • face
                Getting Somewhere
                • Jun 2004
                • 179

                #8
                haha yeah i know. i was only kidding.

                actually native americans are provided some sort of sacred/traditional belt upon which they must swear in court, instead of a bible.

                DJ Mixes | Music Reviews | Podcast | iTunes Podcast | RSS Feed | SoundCloud

                Comment

                Working...