Stone blames 'moral fundamentalism' for US box office flop

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fishingnut
    Addiction started
    • Nov 2004
    • 263

    Stone blames 'moral fundamentalism' for US box office flop

    At the UK premiere of his epic film of Alexander, Oliver Stone last night blamed "raging fundamentalism in morality" for the film's US box office failure.
    "Sexuality is a large issue in America right now, but it isn't so much in other countries," the Oscar-winning director explained yesterday. "There's a raging fundamentalism in morality in the United States. From day one audiences didn't show up. They didn't even read the reviews in the [American] south because the media was using the words: 'Alex is Gay'."

    Meanwhile, Colin Farrell, who plays the title role, helpfully added his own explanation for the biopic's commercial failure: "The film is a draining experience to watch. It's loaded with mythology, icons, symbolism and destiny. My friends have watched the film and said: 'Jesus Christ it's not exactly Gladiator'."

    The ?80m epic has so far cashed in around ?18m at the US box office. The Platoon director previously defended his epic of the Macedonian conqueror, saying that it was too complex for "conventional minds". "The script was just too ambiguous, too questioning about an action-hero who was masculine/feminine. These are tough qualities in Hollywood," the Platoon director said last month. "It's just too big a life. It doesn't fit in into the Hollywood formula."



    did anyone see this movie, did it suck or was it as good as gladitors??
    Don't post anything you wouldn't want yo mamma or the 'feds' to read.
  • Civic_Zen
    Platinum Poster
    • Jun 2004
    • 1116

    #2
    Re: Stone blames 'moral fundamentalism' for US box office fl

    Originally posted by fishingnut
    saying that it was too complex for "conventional minds". "The script was just too ambiguous, too questioning about an action-hero who was masculine/feminine.
    Look at the ego on this cat.

    The movie wasn't very good, had nothing to do with the sexuality that was put in for absolutely no reason. It was the other, utterly boring, and "epic" dialogue scenes that put me to sleep. Angelina Jolie's accent is by far the worst I've ever heard in a movie, worst acting job she has ever done by far. And really the rest of the acting wasn't much better. Overall, I'm just glad I didn't pay to see it.
    "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws." - Tacitus (55-117 A.D.)
    "That government is best which governs the least, because its people discipline themselves."
    - Thomas Jefferson

    Comment

    • Jibgolly
      Vortexuralizor
      • Jun 2004
      • 20773

      #3
      if it's too smart of a film for americans, surely it should rake in gajillions from europe and canada.

      Comment

      • SickBoy
        Addiction started
        • Jun 2004
        • 496

        #4
        the movie sux. As soon as I plopped my ass in that chair I knew it was going to suck. I thought to myself why am I here. Then it hit me their was no other movies to see. I gave it a chance (a 1:30 hr chance) I think i made the right choice. As for Stone saying its to "complex for conventional minds" that must be another way of putting it as a FUCKING GLADIATOR WANNBE BORING DRAWN OUT PIECE OF SHIT. When i go out to see a movie about a historical figure or a war movie I compare it too Gladiator or Saving Private Ryan. Just because the way the movies were shot and the placing of the music. The 13th warrior was a better movie than Alexander at least I sat through that whole movie.

        Comment

        Working...