Originally posted by White_Hindu
To disagreee with lawmakers isn't stupid or pointless. I disagree with lawmakers from my own country let alone others. You argument that just because they are lawmakers then everyone should not question them is ridiculous. Laws in my own coutnry use to make it illegal for minorities and women to vote. If people didn't question those laws back then where would we be today? International public outcry does make an imapct, case in point, when in Nigeria when a women was condemned to be stoned to death for committing adultry while her male counterpart gets off scott free (How fair and just is that?), International public outcry helped her gain a reprieve ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/2023502.stm ).
If Bali feels really strongly about the law, then why don't they apply it more consistenly? Why is it that it has yet to be enforced against well established drug dealers? If they did I would at least have more respect for their convictions, even though I might not agree with them.
All she has to do is pass a polygraph test?!? If it were only that simple my friend.
Comment