The Smearing of the Tea Party

[DIDI]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

@ vinney97 Do you have any idea just how contradictory your posts are What an awful site that is This is quite possibly the most racist statement I have ever read, and it's written by someone denying racism ?? All for the sake of one word.

if some swarthy punk comes through your window to slit your throat for the change on your dresser and rapes your wife while he's at it,

Thanks for the Michael Moore interview though . Really interesting. Wow, at the Kmart thing.

Loved the comparisons with Canada!

[res0nat0r]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

i did?



lmao. where to begin.

you must think america as a whole is much smarter than they actually are. hence all the terrorist talk every day on the news and other OMG TEH TERRORISTS ARE WINNING talk 24/7 for almost a decade now. americans in groups are dumb.

[88Mariner]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Have you interviewed him? No one has much on him other than he's nuts from the random facts people are still piecing together.

I haven't said that it's right wing rhetoric that influenced him - you did. I said violent rhetoric.

atheist, commie, pot-smoking, zeitgeist loving, george w. bush hating grammar-obsessed gamer. yeah, i guess he MIGHT be a republican.

so lettuce ketchup with cereal highsteppa,

what you mean to say is right-wing 'violent rhetoric' is what 'influenced him'. amirite/


or are you suggesting, for, perhaps the first time, that violent left-wing rhetoric caused him to become an assailant?

[88Mariner]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

you must think america as a whole is much smarter than they actually are. hence all the terrorist talk every day on the news and other OMG TEH TERRORISTS ARE WINNING talk 24/7 for almost a decade now. americans in groups are dumb.

disregard pretentious white liberals talking down to everyone, acquire endless amusement.

"everyone is stupid but people who obsess over stewart and maher". that's what you meant to say.

[res0nat0r]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

if you can make a sensical arguement without being batshit insane (beck) or interrupting every other human you talk to within 5 seconds so you can talk down to them like a condescending prick (oreilly), then you have my attention. it doesnt matter if you have an degree from oxford, or if you graduated from the second city.

[vinnie97]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Holy shit, DIDI, "SWARTHY" (having dark complexion or color) is now racist? Political correctness has corrupted your mind.

Highsteppa, I'm not trying to WIN in your mind. I know my argument is on solid ground, and I had to adjust my argument because yours keeps changing. Hard to keep up with whatever you're trying to convey.

[88Mariner]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

if you can make a sensical arguement without being batshit insane (beck) or interrupting every other human you talk to within 5 seconds so you can talk down to them like a condescending prick (oreilly), then you have my attention. it doesnt matter if you have an degree from oxford, or if you graduated from the second city.

why are newsmen making arguments? just wondering.

[res0nat0r]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

why are newsmen making arguments? just wondering.

hummmmmmmm.....ratings maybe?

also to heard off your response of 'if they are making arguments then they arent newsmen', see previous post:

and you can bank on 98% of america seeing any of those commentators/newsmen/talking heads above as reporters because of the fact that they are on fox/cnn/msnbc/etc all the time.

[Highsteppa]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

atheist, commie, pot-smoking, zeitgeist loving, george w. bush hating grammar-obsessed gamer. yeah, i guess he MIGHT be a republican.

It's funny how you keep accusing me of saying that I'm blaming the right wing, but you're the one making all of his political affiliations based on what little data there is. First there's no connection to any of it, but then there's your own political bias shining through and projected on him in order to make yourself feel a bit better about the position you support politically. Project much?

so lettuce ketchup with cereal highsteppa,

This line just proves that you suck at metaphores.

what you mean to say is right-wing 'violent rhetoric' is what 'influenced him'. amirite/

No. Again, that's YOU coming to that conclusion. Nowhere in this thread have I said that.

or are you suggesting, for, perhaps the first time, that violent left-wing rhetoric caused him to become an assailant?

I haven't said that either and wouldn't be even the same remote mindspace as you would to even suggest something as galactically stupid as that. I'm saying the toxic political atmosphere that currently advocates violent imagery, demagoguery and all or nothing eliminationist arguments deserve the scrutiny that they've been getting, regardless of which side has said it, which has been permeating around in American politics for way too long.

If you see that as being a threat to your own political views, well that's your fucking problem to sort out in your own head.

[88Mariner]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

It's funny how you keep accusing me of saying that I'm blaming the right wing, but you're the one making all of his political affiliations based on what little data there is. First there's no connection to any of it, but then there's your own political bias shining through and projected on him in order to make yourself feel a bit better about the position you support politically. Project much?

This line just proves that you suck at metaphores.

No. Again, that's YOU coming to that conclusion. Nowhere in this thread have I said that.

I haven't said that either and wouldn't be even the same remote mindspace as you would to even suggest something as galactically stupid as that. I'm saying the toxic political atmosphere that currently advocates violent imagery, demagoguery and all or nothing eliminationist arguments deserve the scrutiny that they've been getting, regardless of which side has said it, which has been permeating around in American politics for way too long.

If you see that as being a threat to your own political views, well that's your fucking problem to sort out in your own head.

where is this 'violent rhetoric' coming from, then? liber-fucking-tarians?

could you at least provide SOME source to what particular 'violent rhetoric' you're talking about? otherwise, i'm going to assume you're just making shit up for the sake of arguing.

"there's violent rhetoric...it's NOT from conservatives or liberals....and i'm mum about it's source...but really definitely not from conservatives'


also, you have no bloody clue about my political views, so i'm loling at your suggesting that it might taint it because it 'threaten's it. how simple of you.

[Highsteppa]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Highsteppa, I'm not trying to WIN in your mind. I know my argument is on solid ground, and I had to adjust my argument because yours keeps changing. Hard to keep up with whatever you're trying to convey.

I'm sure that in your paranoid little mind your argument is rock solid, even though it's more knee jerk, judgmental, accusation prone and full of selective reading. If you're having trouble following what I'm saying, then follow the instructions that I posted earlier. But I'm guessing you skipped over all of that in order to find the words "liberal", "leftist", "democrat" or "commie" like it's your my first word search book from grade 1.

Keep at it homeslice.

[DIDI]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

@ vinnie97 Read you own post Used in that context it most certainly is ! The old PC attack is so last century. Actually did it ever work even then ??

I can't tell you how glad I am that I don't live in America

[Highsteppa]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

where is this 'violent rhetoric' coming from, then? liber-fucking-tarians?

could you at least provide SOME source to what particular 'violent rhetoric' you're talking about? otherwise, i'm going to assume you're just making shit up for the sake of arguing.

"there's violent rhetoric...it's NOT from conservatives or liberals....and i'm mum about it's source...but really definitely not from conservatives'


also, you have no bloody clue about my political views, so i'm loling at your suggesting that it might taint it because it 'threaten's it. how simple of you.

I'll spell this out for you: all violent rhetoric. I couldn't care less if it's coming from the left or the right. The shit's gotta stop if the country's members that are being designated as leadership thinks that the conversation is being productive based on the criteria I'm criticizing. Are you really that dense?

Stop thinking in 2 dimensional or black and white terms for Chrissakes.

And for a guy that's so offended by what you perceive as being told what your political views are, you're more than willing to brand anyone else with your simplistic, accusatory views of what their politics are.

[runningman]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

ahh where do I begin. I havent said anything int he last couple pages and what I see is disturbing. Look at the attacks on Vinnie. Vinnie has a good idea Im sure of what it is like to go against the liberalism on this site.

When did I get the nickname Runnynose....

[vinnie97]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Lowsteppa, welcome to ignore (the first to receive the honor, congrats). Please stay in Canada and take your own advice (sorry, RM ). I can't stand your pontificating verbal diarrhea because I know it's all hinged on blaming whitey and those violent right-wingers. You jumped on that bandwagon as soon as you arrived in this thread...your deflections to the contrary are full of shit.

DIDI, if the drug fits the face...

And no, making a point of fact is NOT racist, no matter how flippantly it was uttered. This is one of the worst ages of political correctness in modern times, with the thought police ready to pounce at any sign of an incorrect belief being expressed.