The Smearing of the Tea Party

[res0nat0r]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

first pic i see from the site your link above:



you have failed. stupid websites that deal is this type of silly stuff are not taken seriously by anyone with a brain.

RM is obviously trolling because no one can be that retarded, but he tries to make everything black and white which he knows isn't true.

[vinnie97]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

That's what Moonbattery does, pokes fun at the left. It's obvious to anyone with a brain how state-controlled MSNBC is. Sorry if the truth is painful.

[res0nat0r]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

If all you believe is FOX and MSNBC and can't do any critical thinking for yourself then you are fucked no matter what the media does/doesnt print/air.

[88Mariner]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

If all you believe is FOX and MSNBC and can't do any critical thinking for yourself then you are fucked no matter what the media does/doesnt print/air.

disregard pretentious white liberals talking down to everyone, acquire endless amusement.

[res0nat0r]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

the best pundits and news reporters in the US now are comedians. long live bill maher and john stewart.

[Highsteppa]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Runningman is a rare breed Canadian who can see right through all your thought policing, doublespeaking efforts.

You want delusions? Have a gander to see some of the asinine nonsense mainstream liberals are spouting: www.moonbattery.com (i.e. Michael Moore, paraphrased from last night: "Americans' fascination with gun ownership for the sake of self-defense is rooted in racism.")

Michael Savage is a sage, modern day liberalism is one hideous mental disorder.

Don't take any of this to mean I'm a neocon-loving fanatic who still falls head over heels for the military industrial complex. The biggest threats to national survival today are from nannystate leftists who see the constitution as some outdated document to be used loosely only as a reference when making new laws that don't apply to the hideous ruling class (i.e. Need a Waiver For Obamacare? Get in Line.).

Yeah, glad to see you can come back with a nice balanced look at things twinkletoes. The reason why you're loving runnynose's posts is because it appeals to your fantasies of paranoia.

Hope your reacharounds with runnynose are mutually enjoyable.

[88Mariner]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

the best pundits and news reporters in the US now are comedians. long live bill maher and john stewart.

this. explains. everything.

[res0nat0r]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

this. explains. everything.

please continue to espouse with random quips and quotes and funny sayings from dead poets and other random sources and continue to try to be pretentious. it doesn't matter how many syllabi you fit into a post to me, this forum is great lulz. actually this whole politics subforum has brought the collective IQ of every member of MS down by at least 2 points i believe.

[vinnie97]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Highsteppa, the vacuousness of your position is visible for anyone (in their right mind) to see, your homo quips notwithstanding. There's plenty of things to be concerned ("paranoid") about when a govt. is constantly overstepping its constitutional purpose for governing.

Come on, Res. I'd only ever laugh at Bill at his expense, especially with nonsense like this, and I quote, when referencing the batshit crazy case of Jared Loughner: "Because we don't have government healthcare, that's one reason why a crazy person gets a gun, because you know what, it's hard for a crazy person to get a job. So therefore it's hard for them to get healthcare in a country that doesn't have government, etc." (source, including video)

Making more logical leaps than an acrobat on a coke binge (boom tsh).

[res0nat0r]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Highsteppa, the vacuousness of your position is visible for anyone to see, your homo quips notwithstanding.

Come on, Res. I'd only ever laugh at Bill at his expense, especially with nonsense like this, and I quote: "Because we don't have government healthcare, that's one reason why a crazy person gets a gun, because you know what, it's hard for a crazy person to get a job. So therefore it's hard for them to get healthcare in a country that doesn't have government, etc." (source, including video)

Making more logical leaps than an acrobat on a coke binge (boom tsh).

Thanks for this standard misquote. That was from last Fridays episode which I actually watched in its entire 60 minutes, not 18 seconds. I dont know if whatever that moonbattery.com site is, but the actual quote was along the lines of: "this guy bought a gun because he was crazy, he lost/quit his job BECAUSE he was crazy, and BECAUSE he couldn't get/didnt have any healthcase coverage to diagnose he was crazy BECAUSE he couldn't afford it, and we don't have any socialized mental heath, he was able to buy a gun BECAUSE he passed the background check"

Please explain why this isn't sound reasoning?

[88Mariner]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Thanks for this standard misquote. That was from last Fridays episode which I actually watched in its entire 60 minutes, not 18 seconds. I dont know if whatever that moonbattery.com site is, but the actual quote was along the lines of: "this guy got a gun because he was crazy, because he lost his job BECAUSE he was crazy, and BECAUSE he couldn't get any healthcase coverage to diagnose he was crazy BECAUSE he couldn't afford it, he was able to buy a gun BECAUSE he passed the background check"

tell us, what other comedians do you tune into for your news?

[vinnie97]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Yes, the government would have saved us. That's his answer to every ill. Stupid Christians and not enough govt. control over our hapless lives.

Thanks for clarifying the entire quote. ;-) I'll have to find an alternative (hopefully extended) video of the segment.

[res0nat0r]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

^tell me, what is logically incorrect about the above? it doesn't matter if Obama/Jesus/Carrot Top said the above as long as it makes sense.

[Highsteppa]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Highsteppa, the vacuousness of your position is visible for anyone to see, your homo quips notwithstanding.

Oh please, I thought it was already established on this board that it's a public forum, and you're playing the victim claiming of thought policing and "tEh LibaRaLs R cUmiN' 2 gHet mE" shit is as asinine as runnynose's attempts to back up any argument with some random, single internet link and assumes that it allows him some bullshit ghetto pass for the nonsense he posts. Even more asinine is how you and him are desperate to be seen as some kind of authority on these matters with both of you idiots simply searching for whatever confirms your paranoid little fantasies for that day, and stopping as soon as you've confirmed it. Any counter thought or expression of disagreement to your little microcosm of a universe you've built that day is met with hostility. Lighten the fuck up and enough the the cognitive dissonance.

I'm sure that with a couple of searches on Google, I could find some webpage that says your mom's a whore - it doesn't mean it's true.

[res0nat0r]

Re: The Smearing of the Tea Party

Yes, the government would have saved us. That's his answer to every ill. Stupid Christians and not enough govt. control over our hapless lives.

Thanks for clarifying the entire quote. ;-) I'll have to find an alternative (hopefully extended) video of the segment.

Government wouldn't have done shit. One random dude who wants to kill people in some spree is never going to be stopped by the government no matter what. Not at least until RM's wet dreams come true and we all are monitored by the NSA in our homes 24/7. Less guns floating around would have fixed the issue though.

How many shooting deaths were there in Japan last year?