discussion is different from argueing and defensive insulting
god vs. god MMV
Collapse
X
-
-
-
-
Re: miketpoto
i believe things that should happen on this board are insults and offence pertaining to what you are born as. race, colour, sexuality. you shouldn't insult other people based on those things. and i mean personal offence.
the "jesus fucking christ" thing is hillarious and it's offensive on so many levels. primarily it is blasphemous. but i don't think it is worse than any other stuff that goes on here. taking the piss out of religion is risky, and christianity is a soft target, but you choose religion...you get to an age when you are an adult and you can choose. you can't choose your race, colour or sexuality.
sure mike went for CDJ's jugular - but there's obviously something going on between them.
beanz. i don't believe in special cases, but at the same time who said this was a democracy? beanz was so irreverant that if you got offended you were just showing your ignorance.black is the new black www.mercuryserver.comComment
-
Re: miketpoto
precisely. great pic, poto, couldn't stop laughing. funny as, ahem, sin. but i wouldn't have posted it for cowardlydj w/out a forewarned link or cut.Originally posted by picklemonkeydiscussion is different from argueing and defensive insulting
it's easy for non-religious people to throw jesus or god into cursing or profanity because we're not believers. it doesn't mean the same thing, no profundity. most non-religious people i know grew up christian, have the same knowledge base for christianity as church-goers, just don't believe. so it's easy to joke about it the same as with anything else.
what we tend to forget is that religious people often really believe in christ and god in their hearts. it's belief based on faith, and having it poked at will sting more deeply. or come across as a callous, personal hit below the belt to have that image marred. maybe the case here, maybe not. my 2 cents nonetheless...
i don't know. glad the thread's still going...Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: miketpoto
"obviously" was a bit strong. i was merely guessing that could be the case. nasty or jovial. i haven't had time to keep my fingers on the pulse of GYY lately. but if cowardly starts a thread titled "miketpoto", it would be reasonable for one to suspect a previous t?te-?-t?teOriginally posted by miketpotoI see my thread has been born again, unfortunately I have to run away from my desk for a few service calls upstairs but I will be back soon.
Hos, how did you know what wass going on between me and cowardly? Did I have another tell-all-confessional blackout drunk dial?
black is the new black www.mercuryserver.comComment
-
Comment
-
Re: miketpoto
i actually laughed pelo.Originally posted by bart_smastardi had no files on my O.S. once, Had to totaly format H/D and start all over again
black is the new black www.mercuryserver.comComment
-
Re: miketpoto
Originally posted by peloquinno flies on 'ostheres a crappy lil joke in there somewhere .. but whereOriginally posted by bart_smastardi had no files on my O.S. once, Had to totaly format H/D and start all over again
Comment
-
Today's Birthdays
Collapse
[ms] Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 192,209
Posts: 1,238,523
Members: 53,135
Active Members: 32
Welcome to our newest member, jackfroster.


Comment