If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I don't think there are any questions that need answering regarding the actual event. Why it happened, yes, tons of questions that need answering.
And again, the media and conspiracy tits can ask all day long, it's the Bush administration, you're going to get a "go fuck yourself" answer- which, in this case, i kind of admire.
All I have to say is, wow. Pretty amazing that a guy who had never flown a jetliner could bring a plane in at 500mph a few feet off the ground flying 100% horizontal into a low building. Ask any pilot how nearly impossible that is.
Not saying it's a conspiracy. Just saying that the odds are about 1% from that angle. From a steeper angle, say 30%, it would be relatively easy task I would think...
The theorists do not believe eyewitnesses, physical evidence, engineering studies or even the claims of Osama Bin Laden, so it is unlikely that they will be convinced by grainy video frames.
this one is great, especially the last one, ""you were confused""
To understand the conspiracy theory, it is worth considering a film called "Loose Change: 2nd edition". Available on the internet, it reveals the full alternative version of what happened to the Pentagon in all its glory. It states:
AA 77 did not crash into the building. And if there was no AA 77, it must have been a missile, a military aircraft or a drone that did it.
The alleged pilot Hani Hanjour was not skilled enough to execute the manoeuvre and the plane would have stalled in the tight turn alleged.
Street lights were knocked down but did not bring down the plane; therefore there was no plane. They could have been deliberately lifted from the ground.
The damage was not consistent with the size of the airliner and therefore there was no airliner.
There were no remains of either the 757 or passengers and therefore neither existed.
Pieces of fuselage found nearby were planted.
Eyewitnesses who said they saw the plane were confused. Others said they saw a commuter jet or a helicopter.
your life is an occasion, rise to it.
Join My Chant. new mix. april 09. dirty fuck house.
download that. deep shit listed there
the hardcore conspiracy theorists will ignore and rationale, ignore any witnesses as they have to the few thousand NY'ers who watched it happen,, and they will look for an iota of material to exppose and blow up. like the guys who claim cheney was doing it because he was on military excercises that morning. or the guys who say it was done to attack iraq.
your life is an occasion, rise to it.
Join My Chant. new mix. april 09. dirty fuck house.
download that. deep shit listed there
I just don't understand why some people won't look at the facts:
Jeff King MIT Physics PHD & Electrical Engineer says the way the buildings collapsed is impossible without explosives inside. Now why would a guy who could lose everything for speaking against 9/11 speak out?
This guy is from MIT guys.. you need perfect on your SAT's to get in there. So this isn't any idiot.
People from MIT are not even close to fucking normal. Their brains run from the top of their heads to the bottom of the necks. You know how many fucking wackos are "intelligent" ... ahem uni-bomber. Just because you have a PHD_MA_BS_AA does not mean I will call you doctor nor have you operate on me.
the guy who built the towers dies in 9/11. De martini. He designed it. The 9/11 report doesn't even talk about the 47 steel supports in the center of the building.. Why??
I used to never believe any of the conspiracy theorists claims but if you look deep into what happened that day (like the cleveland airport evacuation) it doesn't add up.. I'm with the MIT guy he is smarter then any of the people who wrote the 9/11 report. Its that simple.
oh please you are gonna compare him to the Uni-Bomber? Come on. UniBomber went to Berkley not MIT.
He's NOT smarter than the human eye, which witnessed a plane fly into the pentagon. Seiously man, i've been to the pentagon, there are hundreds of people walking outside of that complex, in and out of it, the lawn, parking lot...it wasn't a ghost town when the plane hit, a LOT of people saw it. Now it's a missle or something?
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment