Tour De France 2006

**KinKyJ** · July 27, 2006, 09:54:10 AM

Re: Tour De France 2006

A menonite on doping? That'll be the day...

**geoffgulley** · July 27, 2006, 10:09:24 AM

Re: Tour De France 2006

.... oops. just when i thought everything was somewhat/kinda/sorta cleaned up.

**asdf_admin** · July 27, 2006, 10:32:31 AM

Re: Tour De France 2006

what an idiot. you cheat, win and get caught. How stupid can you be ... hesh.

**simonr** · July 27, 2006, 03:36:31 PM

Re: Tour De France 2006

From Hero to Zero - I've loved Le Tour since I was a kid, but these idiots are seriously tarnishing an already damaged sport.

**Garrick** · July 27, 2006, 03:52:01 PM

Re: Tour De France 2006

guilty until proven innocent, huh? what a great philosophy....

the same thing happened to lance... i expect it to happen to more in the future. though it looks grim, give the guy the benefit of the doubt until all the results are in.

**shosh** · July 27, 2006, 03:56:59 PM

Re: Tour De France 2006

both are roiders imo

**geoffgulley** · July 27, 2006, 08:27:30 PM

Re: Tour De France 2006

^^ this has nothing to do with roids.... and it wasn't a "positive" test, it was an "abnormal testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio".

**mtguru** · July 27, 2006, 09:51:59 PM

Re: Tour De France 2006

Originally posted by geoffgulley

^^ this has nothing to do with roids.... and it wasn't a "positive" test, it was an "abnormal testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio".

Floyds testosterone levels were that of a normal person but for some reason his epitestosterone were way below normal. You don't dope with epitestosterone. UCI allows for a 4 to 1 ratio with testosterone being the bigger number fo the two. His ratio was 11 to 1!! I hope the B sample comes back non-negative, but for some reason it doesn't, I won't be surprise either. After thinking that Tyler Hamilton couldn't be found guilty of dope and was, I won't be surprise again. According to the Tour de France there was only on positive and that was Floyd. These cyclist are smart and know what they can get away with, but this one doesn't make sense to me.

**geoffgulley** · July 27, 2006, 10:21:39 PM

Re: Tour De France 2006

Originally posted by mtguru

Floyds testosterone levels were that of a normal person but for some reason his epitestosterone were way below normal. You don't dope with epitestosterone. UCI allows for a 4 to 1 ratio with testosterone being the bigger number fo the two. His ratio was 11 to 1!! These cyclist are smart and know what they can get away with, but this one doesn't make since to me.

...and that's the thing, it makes absolutely no sense to me either. Of course neither does going out the night before and drinking Jack Daniels before the last major mountain stage.

**anonin** · July 27, 2006, 11:25:56 PM

Re: Tour De France 2006

LOL!!! homeboy got caught, he should have brought some of that stuff at the local french headshop that cleanses your system, since hes so sweet at cycling he could have biked there and biked to his #1 spot again.

**ggx** · July 28, 2006, 06:02:09 AM

Re: Tour De France 2006

I watched the stages every day, and I was excited about who could win, and finally this... I feel myself deluded...

**Jenks** · July 28, 2006, 08:34:35 AM

Re: Tour De France 2006

Wether he's innocent or not, to the French, he's already a cheater.

**KinKyJ** · July 28, 2006, 09:52:56 AM

Re: Tour De France 2006

^^^ not a compliment coming from a nation of quitters

**beanzncheez** · July 28, 2006, 09:57:12 AM

Re: Tour De France 2006

All I can say is...

**Bryanw24** · July 28, 2006, 11:20:30 AM

Re: Tour De France 2006

Originally posted by KinKyJ

^^^ not a compliment coming from a nation of quitters

go write some peotry or something...

Tour De France 2006

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Today's Birthdays

[ms] Statistics

The Substrate

POWERED BY TITAN