If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I remember Al Franken once referring to the show as being a "thin veneer" of morning friendliness "covering the dark underbelly of Fox's politics". I like that line.
I've never seen a cable news program be so unabashedly biased. They react to unpositive critiques of McCain the way i reacted to "yo' mama" jokes in middle school.
Check this clip out of progressive radio host Ed Schultz taking his mic off and leaving, after being repeatedly interrupted by his conservative counterpart who's utter nonsense he just politely sat through...
i think morning joe is pretty decent, but I don't watch either. fox & friends is geared to a specific market, and you're just not within that scope. kilmeade is a decent host but that doocy guy acts like such a woman.
you could put an Emfire release on for 2 minutes and you would be a sleep before it finishes - Chunky
it's RA. they'd blow their load all over some stupid 20 minute loop of a snare if it had a quirky flange setting. - Tiddles
I don't know why progressive figures continue to treat Fox like it's a legitimate news source that is interested in hearing both sides of a story. On the one hand, I totally sympathize with Schultz, especially because this is hardly the first time he's butted heads with Fox. On the other hand, what exactly did he think was going to happen? Fox has progressives on its programming for the sole purpose of making a big production of dressing them down. For evidence of this at work, watch any episode, at random, of HANNITY & colmes.
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
Fool me over and over and over again by tricking me into thinking you actually want to have me on to be anything other than a rented mule you smack around? That's just silly.
I don't know why progressive figures continue to treat Fox like it's a legitimate news source that is interested in hearing both sides of a story. On the one hand, I totally sympathize with Schultz, especially because this is hardly the first time he's butted heads with Fox. On the other hand, what exactly did he think was going to happen? Fox has progressives on its programming for the sole purpose of making a big production of dressing them down. For evidence of this at work, watch any episode, at random, of HANNITY & colmes.
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
Fool me over and over and over again by tricking me into thinking you actually want to have me on to be anything other than a rented mule you smack around? That's just silly.
That's true, but I think in Big Eddie's case, he feels the facts are on his side and is basically too proud to refuse an invitation. He doesn't want to leave himself open to being called chicken to face the tough questions or whatev. O'Reilly pulls that shit all the time.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment