If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
i think the most blatant noticeable difference in perception was displayed when either Chunky or Rm posted the video the debate below...
... that pretty much sums up the fundamental failure of communication we are having with each other... you guys see one thing and some of us see something entirely differently.
tell me again guys, who wins the following debate?
There were a total of probably 25 respondents and all of them either called back the show (which was about 9/11 being an inside job), or some other nonsense.
Since we all are throwing about random url's by random people here are the top 10 bonehead mistakes by Architects for 9/11 blah blah blah.
Richard Gage freely admits to borrowing from others, but never to the extent you would imagine.
His entire presentation rests on the work done by others, people like Steven Jones, Jim Hoffman, Kevin Ryan, and David Ray Griffin. He also uses clips from and promotes a variety of 9/11 conspiracy films. The most predominant are 911 Mysteries and Loose Change. A variety of other arguments long seen in the debunking wars make their way into the presentation. I've seen evidence that even the slides that make up his presentation came from the slideshows of others.
There were a total of probably 25 respondents and all of them either called back the show (which was about 9/11 being an inside job), or some other nonsense.
I see we get to see more of Reso's scientific data...
1137 and counting Reso.. How many do you have?
Lee Hamilton perhaps? <---Be careful this might be a trap..
College film maker watching shitty youtube videos > NIST scientists with Civil and Structural Engineering Degrees. Rational thinking indeed.
Like NIST engineers who couldn't recreate their theories. Antique CCTV in the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense rational thinking indeed
Like NIST engineers who couldn't recreate their theories. Antique CCTV in the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense rational thinking indeed
The world aint perfect, sorry to disappoint. Hahah, no turret defense guns from Aliens here.
i think the most blatant noticeable difference in perception was displayed when either Chunky or Rm posted the video the debate below...
... that pretty much sums up the fundamental failure of communication we are having with each other... you guys see one thing and some of us see something entirely differently.
tell me again guys, who wins the following debate?
The problem they both argue about what is possible or not. But the reality is they couldn't recreate their theory in the furnaces. To the point they couldn't even weeken the steel.
thanks for those Pop Mechanics vs. Loose Change vids, watched #2 will watch the rest when I get back. I really liked the book cool to see a live debate.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment